Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
That's because you are calling it a dipole and assuming it is a balanced antenna. In reality, it's a quarter wave sideways vertical wire antenna, with a single quarter wave radial at the feed point. See, now it all makes sense. :-) Or a quarter wave end fed horizontal antenna with a single tuned feed point radial. Not only that, I wonder if I can patent them, and sell them via a web site for big bucks. Geoff. You need to have a chat with Billy Mays. If he hasn't made it to networks in that part of the world, you're lucky. HI I'M BILLY MAYS FOR THE HYPER-Q ANTENNA!!!! THIS PATENTED DESIGN OUTPERFORMS EVEN A DIPOLE!!!! .... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Off-center fed dipole, questions | Antenna | |||
Center-fed dipole wifi antenna | Antenna | |||
dipole center space? | Antenna | |||
off-center dipole | Antenna | |||
Off Center Fed Dipole: Windom HSQ | Antenna |