Art Unwin wrote:
On May 6, 11:36 am, Jim Lux wrote:
What if you use a coax with two shields, one shield for chassis ground
which is the coax connection and the outer shield for earth/ground?
Yes, there could be a ground loop but the nearest ground to a strike/
antenna is probably the best protection
You'll still need to deal with RF currents flowing on the outside of the
coax (and also potentially between inner and outer shields).

A good transient suppression scheme at the entry point deals with the
overvoltages from lightning, power lines falling on your antenna, etc.

The challenge is in protecting a sensitive receiver front end, while not
introducing other problems: if the receiver burns out at 1Volt, a clamp
at 300V isn't going to save the front end, although it will keep the
radio from catching on fire. A diode clamp to the supply rails or
similar will save the front end, but will almost certainly result in IMD
issues with strong input signals. Sometimes, the front end just has to
be the sacrificial "fuse", so you want to make sure that it's a cheap &
replaceable part that suffers.

Let me try again and put it another way. What if:
The transmission line is a two parallel wire system.This is enclosed
in one sided metalized mylar isolated shielding Total covered with
insulation and wire netting for true ground ? All of the above buried
in ground


Well, sure.. (leaving aside the problems of running a two wire line
inside a tube) At some point, though, something's got to emerge from
the shielded cage or it's not a electric dipole antenna. (One can make
a totally shielded loop antenna, of course)