| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
dykesc wrote:
1. Does achieving a conjugate match via a transmatch between the transmitter and line do anything to reduce or eliminate mismatch loss in the line? In other words, if a line is 8:1 swr into a complex impedance load are the 8:1 "mismatch" losses still occurring even after achieving low swr with a transmatch? In an ideal system, achieving a conjugate match at the transmatch ensures a conjugate match between the tuner and the antenna. In a low-loss system, that conjugate match is close but not perfect. A conjugate match and an impedance match are NOT the same thing if the SWR is not 1:1 on the transmission line. A conjugate match ensures that maximum power is delivered to the load which ensures maximum current in the transmission line which ensures maximum losses in the transmission line due to SWR. A conjugate match does not change the impedance mismatch or SWR between the transmatch and the antenna. What is usually achieved by a transmatch is a Z0-match at a point. A Z0-match usually ensures that reflected energy will not reach the source and is instead, redistributed back toward the antenna. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Attenuation Questions | Antenna | |||
| Help with mod on MW attenuation on ICOM IC-756PRO 2 | Shortwave | |||
| Conjugate matching and my funky VSWR meter | Antenna | |||
| Pro-95 Attenuation Question... | Scanner | |||
| Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna | |||