Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm starting up an old project that I never quite finished - my loop
antenna. When I first put it together, I tried a simple loop of coax to couple the radio to the loop. Was never really satisfied with that though. I'm wanting to try a gamma match, possibly something a little like what Owen Duffy posted a nice version of. The Gamma match is fairly understandable to me, and I expect it to work well. What I am wondering about is in the coax loop coupling system, how is the best match obtained? Loop size? orientation? Luck? - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last I tried a loop, I used a simple wire loop of about 10 cm diameter
(for a 1 m antenna diameter). The coax version might save you some noise when receiving, but I never tried coax myself, I use solid tubes. For transmitting, coax or not should make no difference. I do have an antenna tuner for the plain dipol. For the loop, you never use antenna tuner. For tuning the loop for transmitting, I find it easy to make the coupling loop variable in size, and just try smaller/large loops, and then fix the size when satisfied Christen oz1aab |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote in news:gvhhkj$do4m$1
@tr22n12.aset.psu.edu: I'm starting up an old project that I never quite finished - my loop antenna. When I first put it together, I tried a simple loop of coax to couple the radio to the loop. Was never really satisfied with that though. I'm wanting to try a gamma match, possibly something a little like what Owen Duffy posted a nice version of. The Gamma match is fairly understandable to me, and I expect it to work well. What I am wondering about is in the coax loop coupling system, how is the best match obtained? Loop size? orientation? Luck? Mike, you haven't given much information about the loop (size, frequency). Is loop balance / symmetry important? If it was a small loop, I would not be thinking about a gamma match because of the impedance ratios for just one reason. Owen |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote in news:gvhhkj$do4m$1 @tr22n12.aset.psu.edu: I'm starting up an old project that I never quite finished - my loop antenna. When I first put it together, I tried a simple loop of coax to couple the radio to the loop. Was never really satisfied with that though. I'm wanting to try a gamma match, possibly something a little like what Owen Duffy posted a nice version of. The Gamma match is fairly understandable to me, and I expect it to work well. What I am wondering about is in the coax loop coupling system, how is the best match obtained? Loop size? orientation? Luck? Mike, you haven't given much information about the loop (size, frequency). Is loop balance / symmetry important? It's Octagonal, .75 inch copper tubing, around 8 feet in diameter. It's designed to just reach into the 80 meter voice segment with it's capacitor setup. Upper end is either 17 or 15 meters. It's been a few years since I worked on this, which is the reason for the "around" remarks. Capacitor is a 4 tube trombone capacitor, each tube roughly a foot in length. External tube is .75 inch, and internal tube is .5 inch. Insulation is wrapped Kevlar sheet around internal tube. Adjustment is via a power screwdriver and a threaded rod setup to move the trombones in and out. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
Mike, you haven't given much information about the loop (size, frequency). Is loop balance / symmetry important? Oops, I didn't mention anything about symmetry in that post. Probably because I'm not sure how important it might be. So if it is an issue, I'm all ears! - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote in news:gvju7l$n034$4
@tr22n12.aset.psu.edu: Owen Duffy wrote: Mike, you haven't given much information about the loop (size, frequency). Is loop balance / symmetry important? Oops, I didn't mention anything about symmetry in that post. Probably because I'm not sure how important it might be. So if it is an issue, I'm all ears! - 73 de Mike N3LI - Mike, the symmetry issue is about whether you want the deepest nulls. A gamma match is not likely to give you the best symmetry and hence the deepest nulls. You are talking about a smallish loop, and without modelling it, I wonder if the gamma feed is as efficient say, as a inner feed loop. You have gone to a lot of trouble to keep losses in the loop down, it would be a pity to compromise it too much with the feed system. Owen |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote in news:gvju7l$n034$4 Oops, I didn't mention anything about symmetry in that post. Probably because I'm not sure how important it might be. So if it is an issue, I'm all ears! Mike, the symmetry issue is about whether you want the deepest nulls. A gamma match is not likely to give you the best symmetry and hence the deepest nulls. You are talking about a smallish loop, and without modelling it, I wonder if the gamma feed is as efficient say, as a inner feed loop. You have gone to a lot of trouble to keep losses in the loop down, it would be a pity to compromise it too much with the feed system. I'm following you here, Owen. I'll put together an inner feed loop and give that a shot. I was looking at the magloop thread you were in on eHam from a little over a year ago. Some good info there. I was thinking about using copper tubing for the loop, but with the area being a variable, I'm considering using something more flexible. Or maybe finding out the area by experimentation, then going with a final loop area in a neater form. Thanks much! - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... Michael Coslo wrote in news:gvhhkj$do4m$1 @tr22n12.aset.psu.edu: I'm starting up an old project that I never quite finished - my loop antenna. When I first put it together, I tried a simple loop of coax to couple the radio to the loop. Was never really satisfied with that though. I'm wanting to try a gamma match, possibly something a little like what Owen Duffy posted a nice version of. The Gamma match is fairly understandable to me, and I expect it to work well. What I am wondering about is in the coax loop coupling system, how is the best match obtained? Loop size? orientation? Luck? Mike, you haven't given much information about the loop (size, frequency). Is loop balance / symmetry important? If it was a small loop, I would not be thinking about a gamma match because of the impedance ratios for just one reason. Owen Owen - I've had this nagging idea for a couple of years: What if the (single-turn?) loop passes through a toroid which already has, say, 10 or so turns on it? That should give an impedance step-up of 100 or so. Would that not be a good way to at least get the matching closer? In fact, the tuning capacitor could be connected to the high impedance side to reduce the capacitor's value. Your comments will be appreciated. John |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John KD5YI wrote:
"Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... Michael Coslo wrote in news:gvhhkj$do4m$1 @tr22n12.aset.psu.edu: I'm starting up an old project that I never quite finished - my loop antenna. When I first put it together, I tried a simple loop of coax to couple the radio to the loop. Was never really satisfied with that though. I'm wanting to try a gamma match, possibly something a little like what Owen Duffy posted a nice version of. The Gamma match is fairly understandable to me, and I expect it to work well. What I am wondering about is in the coax loop coupling system, how is the best match obtained? Loop size? orientation? Luck? Mike, you haven't given much information about the loop (size, frequency). Is loop balance / symmetry important? If it was a small loop, I would not be thinking about a gamma match because of the impedance ratios for just one reason. Owen Owen - I've had this nagging idea for a couple of years: What if the (single-turn?) loop passes through a toroid which already has, say, 10 or so turns on it? That should give an impedance step-up of 100 or so. Would that not be a good way to at least get the matching closer? In fact, the tuning capacitor could be connected to the high impedance side to reduce the capacitor's value. This has been done in a variety of ways (notably some papers from 20 years ago where they used this scheme to couple to the windshield window frame on a jeep. For Rx only, there's no real issues For Tx, though, a small loop will tend to have high currents. There's a LOT of energy stored in the magnetic field (and in the E field of the capacitor that tunes the system). All that reactive energy will be flowing back and forth through the transformer, so it will need a high VA rating. Consider this.. if the loop has an electrical Q of, say, 1000 (which isn't unusual), and you're radiating 100W, then there's 100kW of circulating power in the system. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Lux wrote:
Consider this.. if the loop has an electrical Q of, say, 1000 (which isn't unusual), and you're radiating 100W, then there's 100kW of circulating power in the system. Works on zero point energy? - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Receiver antenna/amplifier matching question | Antenna | |||
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question | Shortwave | |||
Mobile Antenna Matching Question | Antenna | |||
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match | Antenna | |||
help with matching system on delta loop antenna | Homebrew |