Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to

Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? Nonsense. Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. So don't stop. But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

On May 30, 9:20*pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to

Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? *Nonsense. *Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. *So don't stop. *But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Then quit judging people

Art Unwin wrote:
On May 30, 9:20 pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to
Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? Nonsense. Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. So don't stop. But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Then quit judging people

Engineers get to judge. It's part of our job. It's why eventually we
learn enough make buildings and bridges that don't fall down.

And it's why we don't allow people like you design things that need to work.

That's the way it is. You may not like it, but that's just too bad.

tom
K0TAR

On May 30, 9:20*pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to

Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? *Nonsense. *Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. *So don't stop. *But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Nobody has proved that

Art Unwin wrote:
On May 30, 9:20 pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to
Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? Nonsense. Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. So don't stop. But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Nobody has proved that

No, you haven't proved anything. That's the way science works. We don't
have to prove you wrong, you have to prove that you are right.

You seem to have missed that part.

Be specific. Give detailed test conditions. Give exact design
specifications of the test antennas. Give detailed results of your test
measurements. Then someone else can confirm your results or not.

Are you afraid your antennas don't really work? You certainly could
prove prior art if they do. You've been claiming they do for long enough.

Quit hiding behind words and give concrete things that can be tested.

S--t or get off the pot.

tom
K0TAR


tom
K0TAR

tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On May 30, 9:20 pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to
Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? Nonsense. Not even
trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. So don't stop. But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Nobody has proved that

No, you haven't proved anything. That's the way science works. We don't
have to prove you wrong, you have to prove that you are right.

You seem to have missed that part.

Be specific. Give detailed test conditions. Give exact design
specifications of the test antennas. Give detailed results of your test
measurements. Then someone else can confirm your results or not.

Are you afraid your antennas don't really work? You certainly could
prove prior art if they do. You've been claiming they do for long enough.

Quit hiding behind words and give concrete things that can be tested.

S--t or get off the pot.

tom
K0TAR

HELLO?

tom
K0TAR