On Jun 5, 12:03*pm, Szczepan Bia³ek wrote:
*"Dave" .. .



EM or ElectroMagnetic theory does indeed include charged particles.
Maxwell's equations are definately based on charged particles. *just where
does the 'i' term come from if not from moving charges?

Take a glance in Maxwell's Treatise. There is the incompressible massles
fluid.
Maxwell did the math to Faraday ideas. But with one exception. Faraday
discovered the atomic nature of electricity (at electrolise).
Maxwell ignored it. He prefered fluids and whirls. Todays teachers also
prefere it.

and where does the charge term in art's favorite Gauss' law that is part of
Maxwell's equations come from if not from charged particles??

Each genius wrote his own Electrodynamics. They are in some points similar.

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...

snip drivel

until art can provide a reference to the equation for the" Gaussian law of
statics" you should distrust everything he says as being baseless rambling
junk.

On Jun 5, 1:56*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

snip drivel

until art can provide a reference to the equation for the" Gaussian law of
statics" you should distrust everything he says as being baseless rambling
junk.

David is quite correct. Unless the above is fully understood and in
line with all the sciences
as YOU know it then you should push it away as there is no progress to
your understanding
Art

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Jun 5, 1:56 pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message
snip drivel

until art can provide a reference to the equation for the" Gaussian law
of
statics" you should distrust everything he says as being baseless
rambling
junk.

David is quite correct. Unless the above is fully understood and in
line with all the sciences
as YOU know it then you should push it away as there is no progress to
your understanding
Art

hey, i was right about something! of course there is no way for him to
understand the above since even you can't explain it or provide a reference!