"Jack Painter" wrote in message
news:rlt6c.8629$F91.8390@lakeread05...
Mostly one sea-lawyer's rant in this group, was that it is illegal to
interfere with any radio signal, etc. That opinion is absent of
understanding the intent of that law, or where it may be applied.


Using this logic, it is okay to pirate encrypted satellite signals
encroaching on your property....

Pete

" Uncle Peter"
"Jack Painter" wrote in message
Mostly one sea-lawyer's rant in this group, was that it is illegal to
interfere with any radio signal, etc. That opinion is absent of
understanding the intent of that law, or where it may be applied.


Using this logic, it is okay to pirate encrypted satellite signals
encroaching on your property....

Pete

Pete, you smirkingly use the word "pirate" to imply illegal activity, so
answer your own question. Sarcasm aside, then yes you may learn the nature
of anything that enters your property. But we are all well aware of the
consequences for acting on that knowledge.

Jack

"Jack Painter" wrote in message
news:1F_6c.11827$F91.7199@lakeread05...
" Uncle Peter"
"Jack Painter" wrote in message
Mostly one sea-lawyer's rant in this group, was that it is illegal to
interfere with any radio signal, etc. That opinion is absent of
understanding the intent of that law, or where it may be applied.


Using this logic, it is okay to pirate encrypted satellite signals
encroaching on your property....

Pete

Pete, you smirkingly use the word "pirate" to imply illegal activity, so
answer your own question. Sarcasm aside, then yes you may learn the nature
of anything that enters your property. But we are all well aware of the
consequences for acting on that knowledge.

Jack


It is still intentional interference with a LICENSED service, regardless of
where it is used.

Pete