Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 6th 09, 09:41 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 22
Default Obtaining electromagnetic radiation from accelerating electrons

On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:19:09 -0500, Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Lux wrote:
But the important thing is that there's an equal number of positive and
negative charges floating around there, so there's zero net charge. An
possible radiated field from a negatively charged electron will be
exactly matched by the opposite field from a positively charged
something else.


Does that mean a column of salt water could not be used as an antenna?


It just means that moving the water back and forth won't cause
radiation. Waves on the surface of the ocean don't make radio signals.
(C'mon, Cecil. You knew the answer to your question, didn't you? ;-) )

The column of water will conduct a current, which will radiate, but I
think I'd rather use copper or aluminum :-)

--
Rich
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 6th 09, 10:39 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Obtaining electromagnetic radiation from accelerating electrons

Rich Griffiths wrote:
(C'mon, Cecil. You knew the answer to your question, didn't you? ;-) )


Actually, I had never thought about it. I assumed that any
conductor would radiate.

I've been working on a particle beam that ionizes 33 feet
of air for use as an efficient mobile antenna on 40m. Have
I been wasting my time?
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 6th 09, 11:12 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 42
Default Obtaining electromagnetic radiation from accelerating electrons


"Cecil Moore" wrote

I've been working on a particle beam that ionizes 33 feet
of air for use as an efficient mobile antenna on 40m. Have
I been wasting my time?


Unless you can stuff that antenna into a container the size
of two shoe-boxes, and achieve a 9 point something dBi
gain on 160M at the same time, yeah, you're wasting time.
Art's already beat you to it. And Art's antenna doesn't
care one never-mind about the phase information in the
standing wave current ;) good luck in the contest.

Mike W5CHR
Memphis


  #4   Report Post  
Old July 7th 09, 12:47 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 22
Default Obtaining electromagnetic radiation from accelerating electrons

On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:39:34 -0500, Cecil Moore wrote:

snip

I've been working on a particle beam that ionizes 33 feet of air for use
as an efficient mobile antenna on 40m. Have I been wasting my time?


Wasting your time? Heavens no! That would be WAY cool!

Even if it didn't work as an antenna, think how exciting it would be for
birds, people watching the highway from overpasses, ....

--
Rich
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electromagnetic Radiation NO9GL General 10 March 3rd 06 08:33 PM
Electromagnetic Radiation NO9GL Policy 10 March 3rd 06 08:33 PM
Electromagnetic Radiation N9OGL General 31 March 1st 06 03:42 PM
Electromagnetic Radiation N9OGL Policy 32 March 1st 06 03:42 PM
Electromagnetic radiation Mike Terry Shortwave 0 August 24th 04 11:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017