On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:00:01 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote:

First hit in google:

Recent article in the New York Times by Pogue (tech columnist) says
Micro$ofts "Bing" is better than Google. More than 200 blog postings
to the article suggest otherwise. One writer posed that when he
offered both search engines the keywords "lincoln jefferson adams",
that Bing's first match was to Kentucky Fried Chicken.

Another poster observed "everyone googles themself." He did likewise
in both engines and found Bing came up with bunk while google found
him easily.

This can be tested at:
http://bing-vs-google.com
where I put the keywords (no quotes) "Telonic RHO-TECTOR TRB-50 return
loss bridge" into the search line. Bing came back empty.
http://bing-vs-google.com/?q=Telonic...rn+loss+bridge

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC