Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 ago, 19:30, "KJ4NTS" wrote:
I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. *I understand that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? Hello, As you might know, the current that goes into the end-fed antenna equals the current that goes into the counterpoise. The requirement for a good, efficient counterpoise is that it should not dissipate the RF power and that (preference) the impedance is far below the feed point impedance of the end-fed antenna. The requirement last mentioned is for assuring that you can feed your antenna with an unbalanced feeder (coaxial cable). It also helps to avoid that when you touch a coaxial connector while transmitting, you don't burn your fingers. Half or full wave resonant antennas have high input impedance (kOhm range), hence requirements for counterpoise are easy to meet. It is easy to create a counterpoise impedance of several hundreds Ohms. For a quarter wave (or shorter antenna), the resonant impedance is in the 30 Ohms range or below (for short antennas). In that case it may be very difficult to get counterpoise impedance far below 30 Ohms. As Geoffrey mentioned, with 100 replies, you will have 100 different answers. There are many ways to make a counterpoise; all have their advantages (and disadvantages). Generally spoken, the more metal the better. However at a certain point, doubling the amount/length of metal will not give significant increase. When you add more metal and the antenna impedance at resonance doesn't change, adding more metal is not necessary. In my opinion, many short wires are better then one long wire. When you have good ground conductivity, driving rods deep into the ground is not necessary (skin depth issue). In case of single frequency band operation, you might consider 2 or 3 elevated quarter wave resonating counterpoise wires. I know this is not a direct answer to your question, but I hope it will bring you closer to an answer. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl please remove the obvious character combination in case of PM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|