Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KJ4NTS" wrote in message
... I'm confused about the requirements for a counterpoise for an end-fed wire antenna. I understand that it's needed, but I don't understand what the requirements are. Can a ground stake at the base of the feed point serve as a counterpoise, or does it need to be another wire running under the ground below the antenna? If a wire is required, how long does the counterpoise have to be? Would it be better to use insulated or uninsulated wire for a buried counterpoise? All these questions depend on your particular situation. In a typical antenna installation you would first seek to follow the instructions for that antenna. Especially if you don't understand the physics involved. You will probably already have some sort of ground through the power supply. Any better ground than that must actually be better to whatever energy you are trying to "ground". Someone mentioned RF in the shack and being bit from the chassis or connector shell. The best way to avoid that is for the energy at the coax connector to see 50 ohms, and for the radiating portion of the antenna to be well out of the shack. In that case, you don't need an RF ground on the radio. A ground stake at the feed point along with a remote tuner should be sufficient if you have really low resistance soil. You will probably benefit by adding a counterpoise and you will probably never have a perfect ground. It is better to have uninsulated wire because it will conduct into the ground. Some think insulated is better because it will last longer for a little expense in performance. A remote tuner (or matched antenna) at the feed point, will keep the RF to the transmission line and prevent high voltages on the line and keep losses to the minimum. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|