Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "'Doc" wrote in message ... Dale, I'm not disputing your claims, but what does "slightly more integrated gain", mean? 'Doc We sent all the commercially available omnis to the Motorola anechoic chamber in Boynton Beach FL. Traditional shortened dipole type omnis ( loop/haloes) showed an elliptical AZ pattern- about 3dB "out of omni" as I recall. If one only measured the gain off the front or rear this style antenna had more gain than the isosceles triangle style omni- whose electrical length is longer than a half wave. However if one looked at the gain every 10 degrees or so of azimuth and averaged this over the full 360 degrees, the triangle style had more gain- again, from memory, it was about 0.5 dB better- not a lot, but in the right direction. Modeling confirms both the pattern and gain. Dale W4OP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |