LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old August 8th 09, 02:37 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Log periodic antenna

professorpaul wrote:
On Aug 7, 5:03 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Question is: Why would an amateur radio operator
want to cover 148 MHz to 420 MHz with a transmitting
antenna?


I only want to cover 144 and 420, nothing in between! Just for LEO
satellites, where the uplink is on 144 and the downlink is 420, or vis
versa.


Then you would be wasting 98% of the frequency coverage
of the log periodic. The unused antenna elements would
constitute almost the total cost of the antenna.
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Log-Periodic Antenna Design Rich Grise Antenna 131 January 18th 09 02:17 AM
Log periodic antenna design JIMMIE Antenna 14 June 29th 07 05:14 PM
radiation pattern of log-periodic antenna [email protected] Antenna 4 March 6th 07 12:37 AM
FA log periodic outdoor scanner antenna jeff Scanner 0 February 26th 06 01:13 AM
FA: WiNRADiO AX-31B Planar Log-Periodic Antenna Bill Crocker Scanner 3 January 18th 04 02:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017