Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
professorpaul wrote:
On Aug 7, 5:03 pm, Cecil Moore wrote: Question is: Why would an amateur radio operator want to cover 148 MHz to 420 MHz with a transmitting antenna? I only want to cover 144 and 420, nothing in between! Just for LEO satellites, where the uplink is on 144 and the downlink is 420, or vis versa. Then you would be wasting 98% of the frequency coverage of the log periodic. The unused antenna elements would constitute almost the total cost of the antenna. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Log-Periodic Antenna Design | Antenna | |||
Log periodic antenna design | Antenna | |||
radiation pattern of log-periodic antenna | Antenna | |||
FA log periodic outdoor scanner antenna | Scanner | |||
FA: WiNRADiO AX-31B Planar Log-Periodic Antenna | Scanner |