| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve Nosko wrote:
"To change the phase, yes...To change the pattern. Probably not." Certainly changing just the phase of the signal between two identical driven elements makes an enormous difference in radiation pattern. My newest copy of the ARRL Antenna Book is the 19th edition, but most editions will have a figure similar to Fig 11 on page 8-8 of my copy. The double-page figure is arranged into (8) vertical columns of radiation patterns. Each column is for a different physical spacing between the two parallel elements. All of the (5) patterns in a vertical column have the same physical space between elements. The only change between patterns in a vertical column is the phase angle between the two elements. The top pattern is for 0-degrees between the elements; they are fed in-phase. Other patterns are given for: 45, 90, 135, and 180-degrees electrical phasing between the two elements. It is obvious that the pattern changes every time the phase between the elements changes. There are several ways to get the desired phase change. Roy Lewallen has written an article in QST on the subject and has entered suggestions in the ARRL Antenna Book. You can find them for yourself. Commercial arrays often use a special T-network. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||