LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 23rd 04, 08:29 AM
Jack Twilley
 
Posts: n/a
Default

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Richard" == Richard Clark writes:


Jack Actually, my goal is for the antenna to be resonant at 7.150.
Jack If it's resonant too low, then I need to shorten the wires even
Jack more, right?

Richard Hi Jack,

Richard Resonance is not all that it is cracked up to be. Be careful
Richard of seeking something that yields little return on your
Richard effort.

This is a very good point.

Richard For instance, the numbers you've offered show a very low Z
Richard for that anticipated goal. This means you will still need to
Richard transform that value to reduce SWR, which in its own pursuit
Richard is an equally low yield return.

Yes, but pursuing a match close to 1:1 and an impedance close to 50
ohms seems to be a reasonable pursuit, if I understand correctly.

Richard You will need a tuner any way you look at it, and the higher
Richard R values at the higher frequencies are probably more due in
Richard part to the loss of nearby ground, rather than the miracle of
Richard a neighboring resonance.

Possibly. I hope a accurate description of my antenna's geometry and
surrounding structures will assist in resolving this question.

Richard My guess is that you have already obtained an optimal
Richard situation = it don't get any better than this even with all
Richard the trimming you may accomplish. Worse, you could double its
Richard height and contacts may never notice the improvement in
Richard "efficiency." Basically all your work is to achieve bragging
Richard rights, and you could cheat and start bragging right now to
Richard no one's challenge.

That's a reasonable guess. However, I think I've got a bit more
experimenting to do before I can reach that conclusion. I disagree
with the assertion that "bragging rights" is the goal here, though. I
don't see any point in bragging -- there's nothing terribly unusual or
special about what I'm doing. I'm not going after DXCC with a
magnetic loop the size of a ream of paper, or WAS from a radio in an
Altoids can. I'm just trying to have the best antenna my environment
and budget can support.

Richard 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Jack.
- --
Jack Twilley
jmt at twilley dot org
http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAX/V8GPFSfAB/ezgRAt50AKCq7zoLl5a5QFvJXYhAqDDvynP32QCbBm+I
inV/OPyW2pLenSTK/jppimE=
=m5xy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 04:08 AM
EH Antenna Revisited Walter Maxwell Antenna 47 January 16th 04 04:34 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017