Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "Richard" == Richard Clark writes: Jack Actually, my goal is for the antenna to be resonant at 7.150. Jack If it's resonant too low, then I need to shorten the wires even Jack more, right? Richard Hi Jack, Richard Resonance is not all that it is cracked up to be. Be careful Richard of seeking something that yields little return on your Richard effort. This is a very good point. Richard For instance, the numbers you've offered show a very low Z Richard for that anticipated goal. This means you will still need to Richard transform that value to reduce SWR, which in its own pursuit Richard is an equally low yield return. Yes, but pursuing a match close to 1:1 and an impedance close to 50 ohms seems to be a reasonable pursuit, if I understand correctly. Richard You will need a tuner any way you look at it, and the higher Richard R values at the higher frequencies are probably more due in Richard part to the loss of nearby ground, rather than the miracle of Richard a neighboring resonance. Possibly. I hope a accurate description of my antenna's geometry and surrounding structures will assist in resolving this question. Richard My guess is that you have already obtained an optimal Richard situation = it don't get any better than this even with all Richard the trimming you may accomplish. Worse, you could double its Richard height and contacts may never notice the improvement in Richard "efficiency." Basically all your work is to achieve bragging Richard rights, and you could cheat and start bragging right now to Richard no one's challenge. That's a reasonable guess. However, I think I've got a bit more experimenting to do before I can reach that conclusion. I disagree with the assertion that "bragging rights" is the goal here, though. I don't see any point in bragging -- there's nothing terribly unusual or special about what I'm doing. I'm not going after DXCC with a magnetic loop the size of a ream of paper, or WAS from a radio in an Altoids can. I'm just trying to have the best antenna my environment and budget can support. Richard 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAX/V8GPFSfAB/ezgRAt50AKCq7zoLl5a5QFvJXYhAqDDvynP32QCbBm+I inV/OPyW2pLenSTK/jppimE= =m5xy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |