Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "Richard" == Richard Clark writes: Richard On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:29:43 -0800, Jack Twilley Richard wrote: Yes, but pursuing a match close to 1:1 and an impedance close to 50 ohms seems to be a reasonable pursuit, if I understand correctly. Richard Hi Jack, Richard This is an aspiration on par with monks seeking nirvana. The Richard two illustrate it is the path, not the destination that is Richard meaningful. Richard There is a very clear point to be made that unless you Richard elevate the dipole, any 50 Ohm characteristic you observe Richard will more ground loss than radiation resistance. This is Richard reasonable only in the sense of ease of tuning and the Richard reductio ad absurdum is bliss can be found in a dummy load. Oh, I see your point here. What you're saying is that my dipole is so far from the ideal that reaching 50 ohms won't mean anywhere near the same thing that it does to the ideal case. That begs the question, then -- if not 50 ohms, what is the best value for my particular configuration? Richard Clipping the ends of the current structure do not lead to Richard increased benefit unless you shave your advantage in tenths Richard of a dB. To put that in perspective, unless you are a Richard teenager, you and your contacts couldn't possible hear any Richard change below 1dB variation. To force that perspective Richard further, propagation variation through one QSO easily varies Richard by that much or more (unless we are talking line of sight FM Richard with full quieting). I've listened to QSOs where they've ebbed down to the noise floor and flooded back several times over the course of a minute, so I understand what you're saying. Richard 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC I am really interested in knowing what sort of target values would represent an optimal configuration, if that's at all possible. Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAYK1zGPFSfAB/ezgRArdhAKDfNKIpcmwQvZaJjulkOrwc4sGK+wCfVlap TxvN060RLyzIZD4+YO6MXrc= =Kg/a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |