Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... On Sep 5, 7:00 pm, Art Unwin wrote: * Where do you get this stuff from? Please visit a library - you could do yourself a lot of good. Chris Chris, what I believe he is referring to is that computer programs support a tipped vertical over one at right angles to earth. Computer programs are supposed to be based on Maxwell's formula. Is this an error and how do we fix it. If it is not an error then it supports the presence of the Coriolis force in collusion with gravity. and not gravity alone. ------------ The NEC computer programs are not in error. The error is in understanding how far-field patterns develop. Art, please read the following link about "tipped verticals," which hopefully will lead to a better understanding of this issue. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...74e9df6d9d1aa9 RF * Richard, thank you for that. I stand by what I have stated in several places earlier in this thread, that if tipping-over a monopole or dipole results in more gain in one direction then that will be counteracted by less gain in another direction (i.e. azimuth) as your eznec pattern illustrates. There is also the question of polarisation purity. Chris |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |