Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 6, 4:02*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 6, 3:02*pm, Richard Fry wrote: Now for your eznec set up. If it were me I would not quit so early but at least try to fill a quadrant so you can determine a step that appears logical ------- If you understood NEC programs and the underlying physical principles on which they are based, Art, you would realize that the graphic comparison I posted represents the BEST CASE for those two conditions. Average performance over a quadrant is even worse. If you have another "step" that appears logical to you, and which you think proves your point, I'll be happy to model it if you will supply acceptable details. But from your point of view, you'd have been better off not making such a statement. RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |