LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 11th 09, 12:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 797
Default Corriolis force


"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
...

"tom" wrote
. net...
Szczepan Białek wrote:

And you tell us that radiation from monopoles antennas is polarised.
There was a topic polarisation. In wave area is term alignment when we
have the two sources. Aligment of "dipoles" not means that waves are
"transverse".
In the reality no transverse waves. Waves appear in compressible medium.
All waves are the "pressure" waves. In math you can assume
incompressibility. But we here NO.
S*


So, pray tell, explain the physics of a vertically polarized pressure
wave.


One wave is not polarised. The two pressure waves from the two sources
interfere. See "Directivity and phasing".

You obviously know what's going on here, and I do not. Please educate
me.


"This fourth edition blends, in Joseph J. Carr's words, "the theoretical
concepts that the engineers and others need to design practical antennas,
and the hard-learned practical lessons derived from actually building and
using antennas -real antennas, and the hard-earned practical lessons
derived from actually building and using antennas - real antennas made of
real metal - not merely theoretical constructs on a blackboard."

Now is the electronic era. Electronic is from electrons. They are
compressible and have the inertia. You all construct antennas where
electrons build up voltage. But on the blackboard are math for
incompressible fluid.


no it isn't. you are obviously way out of date. stop looking way in the
past for theories that were obviously disproven decades ago and look at
modern texts to see which ones have survived 100+ years of experimental
evidence.

Look at the famous equations - there no voltage at all (only current).


in any electronic system you really only need voltage OR current, they are
always related by the impedance. So if you read modern texts you will often
see that they derive equations in either voltage or current form then show
the other form for reference, or sometimes leave it as an excercise for the
student.

If somebody do math for electrons then such math will be on the
blackboards.
But it is not necessary. The beautifull EM equations are the same like for
fluid mechanics. They will be saved. Radio engineers do not use them and
can wait for the proper ones the next centuries.


no, real engineers are trying to educate people like you who are stuck in
the past with outdated theories and simplified misconceptions... or we could
just ignore you and hope you go away quickly. personally i think it is more
fun to watch what comes out of the mouths of babes when you tickle their
feet.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Force 12 - C3S [email protected] Antenna 1 October 8th 07 06:56 AM
Air Force 1 dxAce Shortwave 3 May 21st 05 08:08 PM
Air Force One dxAce Shortwave 0 June 29th 04 05:40 PM
FS: Force 12 jerryz Swap 0 October 12th 03 12:47 PM
Force 12 C-4 jerryz Antenna 0 August 9th 03 02:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017