Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message ... "tom" wrote . net... Szczepan Białek wrote: And you tell us that radiation from monopoles antennas is polarised. There was a topic polarisation. In wave area is term alignment when we have the two sources. Aligment of "dipoles" not means that waves are "transverse". In the reality no transverse waves. Waves appear in compressible medium. All waves are the "pressure" waves. In math you can assume incompressibility. But we here NO. S* So, pray tell, explain the physics of a vertically polarized pressure wave. One wave is not polarised. The two pressure waves from the two sources interfere. See "Directivity and phasing". You obviously know what's going on here, and I do not. Please educate me. "This fourth edition blends, in Joseph J. Carr's words, "the theoretical concepts that the engineers and others need to design practical antennas, and the hard-learned practical lessons derived from actually building and using antennas -real antennas, and the hard-earned practical lessons derived from actually building and using antennas - real antennas made of real metal - not merely theoretical constructs on a blackboard." Now is the electronic era. Electronic is from electrons. They are compressible and have the inertia. You all construct antennas where electrons build up voltage. But on the blackboard are math for incompressible fluid. no it isn't. you are obviously way out of date. stop looking way in the past for theories that were obviously disproven decades ago and look at modern texts to see which ones have survived 100+ years of experimental evidence. Look at the famous equations - there no voltage at all (only current). in any electronic system you really only need voltage OR current, they are always related by the impedance. So if you read modern texts you will often see that they derive equations in either voltage or current form then show the other form for reference, or sometimes leave it as an excercise for the student. If somebody do math for electrons then such math will be on the blackboards. But it is not necessary. The beautifull EM equations are the same like for fluid mechanics. They will be saved. Radio engineers do not use them and can wait for the proper ones the next centuries. no, real engineers are trying to educate people like you who are stuck in the past with outdated theories and simplified misconceptions... or we could just ignore you and hope you go away quickly. personally i think it is more fun to watch what comes out of the mouths of babes when you tickle their feet. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |