| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 14, 6:35*pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:40:24 GMT, "Dave" wrote: "Art Unwin" wrote in message .... The above also solves the identification of the Weak Force which provided completion of the Standard Model as envisioned by Einstein. All is now of a proven nature UNTIL my peers can point to where it deviates from existing laws of Classical Physics. you violate the range of the weak and strong forces. *they are both confined to the nucleus of the atom and have nothing to do with the conduction band electrons. Ah! But if you extrapolate the nucleus as the sun of the solar system, the earth as an electron; then the conduction band is easily managed with a weak force as significant as a bite of bread stuck to the roof of your mouth with peanut butter. Peanut butter is diamagnetic, and if you buy the crunchy style, you get the combination of waves and particles. [this premonitory peanutbutter presentation posting possibly protected by provisional patent pending] 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC You used David as your role model! You also stamped all over Dr Davis. You would be better off standing on David's shoulders and staying in lock step with him and hold that silly tongue of yours for your next partner. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
| Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
| Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
| Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
| Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna | |||