Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:30:50 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote: On Sep 14, 5:45*pm, "Dave" wrote: "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... Point to a law that I have violated *of which you learned about in academia. As for me I am at peace with my offering and thus can move on until a violation of law is presented. then don't you dare go away until you explain how your weak and strong force can have any effect on conduction band electrons when their range of effect is confined to the nucleus. And why not? If you're going to go away just go away. I don't understand why you would expect anyone to accept your fancies as fact based upon the rambling, incoherent explanations you provide. Your only success is the audience you have gathered while acting as troll. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |