Art Unwin wrote:


I don't know who you are or where you came from into this discussion
that has lasted for years. I did read a portion of what you stated

As expected, you ignore that which conflicts with your claims.

but
you must recognize that this newsgroup
is like a magnet to those who want to sound off without revealing
themselves. It is called free speechand I know not where you fit in! I
am sorry I inadvertently came into your court room your honour. Joe
the judge I presume and not Joe the plumber
That is the best I can do for you until the patent office prints the
rest.

I have read you patent.

http://www.freshpatents.com/Gaussian...hp?type=claims

http://www.freshpatents.com/Gaussian...pe=description

http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...FPTO%2Fsearch-
bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Gaussi an+radiative+cluster%22&OS=%22Gaussian+radiative+c luster%22&RS=%22Gaussian+radiative+cluster%22

It broadly describes a yagi antenna after it has been blown down
by a wind storm. No wonder the patent office has an issue with it.

Then you can base all the above accusations that you made prior to the
facts

You patent does not provide any facts that support the claims you
have been making in this group.