Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 1:31*am, JIMMIE wrote:
On Sep 15, 8:15*am, jaroslav lipka wrote: On Sep 15, 7:06*pm, "christofire" wrote: There is very little apparent similarity between Nicola Tesla and that 'Art Unwin' character. *Tesla was an inventor who realised amazing feats of hardware construction, some of which worked as intended. *'Professor Unwin' doesn't appear to create anything in hardware - he just talks about his own, paraphysical theories and expects others to believe what he says. Again, don't believe what I write - go to a technical library and read the stuff that made it into books. *You can't rely on what people write on the internet; there are too many 'Unwins' out there. Chris * Hi Chris * * * * * * * *The question that goes to nub of Arts claim is why is adding a time varying field to the Gaussian law of statics illegal? *or to state it another way, * * *How is it illegal to change a static field into a dynamic field? can you, will you answer the question or are you just sitting on Richards shirt tail. *Jaro Applying time to a static field doesn't make a static field a dynamic field. Jimmie OUCH bad timing Jimmie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |