| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 16, 6:46*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: Skin effect refers to current flow along the aluminum. Actually, it is more complicated than that. Since the current impulse travels at the speed of light, the current impulse energy transfer necessarily involves photons. Note there is no current impulse traveling at the speed of light under steady-state DC conditions which is the only kind of current being carried 100% by electrons. Any current, e.g. RF current, traveling at the speed of light, involves photons, even the DC impulse current. When you get to the point when the impedance is zero it shows that all applied current has been applied outside the aluminum which is now not carrying ANY of the applied current. WOW! It is true that one can set EZNEC to lossless conditions but one cannot do that in the real world. Aluminum and copper are only ever lossless at superconductor temperatures. 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, *http://www.w5dxp.com Let me make myself quite clear on this point before the thread closes. My position is that a radiator must be 1WL to achieve equilibrium. When considering a 1/2 wave vertical one can only make it a closed circuit of 1 WL is by adding a ground plane rather than assuming that we have conflicting charge directions on the surface of the 1/2 WL. We now review the circuit (tank circuit) that applies to radiation. We now accept that particles do rest on diamagnetic surfaces per the Gauss extension. In fact, this surface or sleeve of particles is so tightly formed that it has the hoop stress of a arbitrary boundary such that nothing is removed from the diamagnetic material itself. In the case where a particle is driven away from this border its place is immediately taken up by one of the billions of particles floating around looking for a diamagnetic place to rest. We can now see that current applied to a radiating element splits into two paths in parallel One leg is in the intervening space between the particles and the diamagnetic material and the other leg IN the surface of the diamagnetic material called skin effect. A computer program only recognizes the diamagnetic element such that it only points to the impedance presented by that separate current track . Thus with increase in radiation the impedance referred to by the computer is SOLELY of that presented by the diamagnetic material. Thus when the program states zero impedance it is stating that no current is being applied to the diamagnetic material and where all current is routed to the arbitrary boundary consisting of tightly bound particles. The concept of extreme cooling for zero resistance is not required when no current is applied! All the current is now being carried by the arbitrary border where all forces can be accounted for since there are no losses incurred! Of-course the program itself leaves the operator to sort this out because it did not supply a complete circle of energy flow by ignoring the current applied to the particle sleeve or boundary, where the energy lost in the programs element is not supplanted with the energy gain of the arbitrary border! This suggests that somewhere in the program the positive and the minus signs were accidently interchanged. If the programmer had recognised the existance of the Gaussian border he would have the provided the means of energy transfer to it and thus fully abided with the concept of equilibrium. Art |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
| Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
| Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
| Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
| Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna | |||