Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 18, 12:51*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message ... On Sep 11, 6:36 pm, "Dave" wrote: The problem is that all forces are not accounted for per Maxwell requirements! maxwell made no such requirement. *the strong, weak, and gravitational force are not in his equations... never were and never will be. In your case magnetic energy remains with the radiator which is a loss that is unaccounted for ! This loss does not occur with a diamagnetic materials. Very simple my dear Watson. then why do my ferromagnetic antennas work better than there diamagnetic predecessor?? If a design is planar it just cannot be 100% efficient as when all forced are accounted for. nothing is 100% This is when all current is transferred to the particle encapsulation and no current travels in the radiator carrier ie Radiation resistance is 52 ohms |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |