| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 13, 9:05*pm, JIMMIE wrote:
On Sep 13, 6:35*pm, wrote: On Sep 13, 5:21*am, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: The B version has a piece of mast below the main part of the antenna. *Is there much difference in performance between the arx2b and the original arx2? -- Chuck Forsberg * *www.omen.com*503-614-0430 Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications * Omen Technology Inc * * *"The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 * FAX 629-0665 There is no extra mast. You are using the support mast below the feed point. The extra parts are a 50 inch length of coax, and a union to support a set of 20 inch long radials. The radials are connected to the shield of the coax. Years ago I converted an original Ringo Ranger to a Ringo Ranger two using home brew parts. I then did comparison tests with and without the radial set. Made a huge difference in performance in my case. Cushcraft seemed to consider it a third 5/8 WL element, but I tend to consider it a decoupling section much like the lower cone you see on an Isopole, or using a 2nd set of radials or cones below a ground plane. Yes, it is worth converting. The ARX2B is a pretty good antenna. Not quite as good as the Isopole, but close. I have seen people swear by and swear at Ringo Rangers. Is this because of by chance some people get the right/wrong length mast and/ or coax length? Jimmie That could be the case with the non decoupled version. :/ But the RR2 is a pretty good antenna. I used one for a long time and never had any problems. The mast and coax length could be fairly critical on the non decoupled version. Like I said, I converted an old ARX2 to a ARX2B and then compared the two when receiving local signals. The difference in my particular case was quite large. I'm talking 2-3+ S units on the radio meter which actually would be a huge difference. It was quite apparent that the common mode currents were really whacking the pattern on the one I tried without the decoupling section. I assume most was from the feed line. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| EZNEC model of a 2m Ringo Ranger | Antenna | |||
| Ringo Ranger II | Antenna | |||
| ARX2B Ringo Ranger | Antenna | |||
| WTB: Ringo Ranger II | Swap | |||
| Cushcraft Ringo Ranger II | Antenna | |||