Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szczepan Białek" wrote in message ... "Cecil Moore" wrote ... Richard Fry wrote: At the top of a monopole, and at the ends of a dipole the net current is almost zero -- so those locations generate very little of the total EM radiation from these antennas. Since the forward current and reflected current are equal in magnitude and opposite in phase at the ends, they act like transmission line currents and the magnetic fields cancel at the ends. They are in phase at the feedpoint - hence the maximum radiation at that point. EM means elecro- magnetic. Radiation can start from any of them, See what Richard Harrison wrote: "At the open circuited ends of a resonant antenna there is almost double the forward voltage but zero total current due to cancellation of the dorward and reflected currents at the open circuit. At the open circuit in the wire, all the energy in the wave is transferred to the electric field." S* See my post earlier in this thread. You are misinterpreting what Richard Harrison wrote to suit your own, incorrect, made-up version of how antennas work. Please think on this, Szczepan Białek: the likelihood that your personal version of the physics is correct is vanishingly small - when it conflicts with the version everyone else (except perhaps Art Unwin) appears to understand from their education, which is derived from the basis for antennas that have been in use for more than 100 years. Chris |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poynting Vector in Standing Waves | Antenna | |||
Standing morphing to travelling waves, and other stupid notions | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |