On Sep 22, 8:13*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Sep 21, 7:33 pm, "christofire" wrote:

snip crapNo it does not appear in Kraus book. He never followed Maxwells laws
with respect to equilibrium.

snip more crap

and he had a good reason not to... because its all made up by you art, and
its totally WRONG!

So you are back David ! have you built that four poster antenna yet,
of steel I presume,
for the top band? Hopefully the system of yours is in a state of
equilibrium so you can tell us good things about it. Did you have to
make a ground plane system? They are not needed for a system in
equilibrium so you may have displaced a lot of moles from their
habitat for no good reason. Haven't heard you mention anymore about
that book you were writing on antennas. I assume you do not have a
chapter about equilibrium as yet. And that problem you had about the
legality of turning a static field into a dynamic field, have you made
any progress on that yet ( just pulling your tail)

Art Unwin wrote:
So you are back David ! have you built that four poster antenna yet,
of steel I presume,
for the top band? Hopefully the system of yours is in a state of
equilibrium so you can tell us good things about it. Did you have to
make a ground plane system? They are not needed for a system in
equilibrium

Wow! No ground system needed for top band. The AM broadcasters are
going to be all over this. Art, you are about to become very very rich.
This overturns every measurement ever made on AM broadcast antenna
arrays. You should be very proud that hundreds of engineers and their
measurements were wrong.

Again, congratulations.

tom
K0TAR

On Sep 22, 8:47*pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
So you are back David ! have you built that four poster antenna yet,
of steel I presume,
for the top band? Hopefully the system of yours is in a state of
equilibrium so you can tell us good things about it. Did you have to
make a ground plane system? They are not needed for a system in
equilibrium

Wow! *No ground system needed for top band. *The AM broadcasters are
going to be all over this. *Art, you are about to become very very rich..
* This overturns every measurement ever made on AM broadcast antenna
arrays. *You should be very proud that hundreds of engineers and their
measurements were wrong.

Again, congratulations.

tom
K0TAR

No congratulations necessary. The methods will be available to all
amateurs when the PTO print out comes about. All of this represents a
different aproach than that taken before me. If it is 90 % in error
where only 10% is useful that's fine by me as it represents an advance
supplied by an amateur who wasn't detered from experimenting by
others.
If I feel that something that is taken for granted is in error just
because an author had it printed in a book I will always step forward
if I feel the emperer does not wear any clothes.
Which of you have the courage to stand along side me knowing full well
your character will be dismantled before the true facts become known?

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
So you are back David ! have you built that four poster antenna yet,
of steel I presume, for the top band?

only 2 elements for top band, 4 for 80m out of rohn tower, and 4 for 40m out
of steel pipe towers... and they all work great without any magical
levitating diamagnetic solar neutrinos!

Haven't heard you mention anymore about
that book you were writing on antennas. I assume you do not have a
chapter about equilibrium as yet.

i never said i was writing a book on antennas. it has some antennas in it,
but its not about antennas.