Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Antonio Vernucci wrote:
I knew that the resonant point does not precisely coincide with the minimum SWR point, but I would not have suspected such a big difference (2 MHz shift at 29 MHz!). There's a thread over on eHam.net dealing with this same subject. Many complex antennas exhibit this effect to a certain extent. The reason is obvious. Our SWR meters are calibrated for 50 ohms and an antenna may be resonant with a e.g. 9+j0 ohm feedpoint impedance. That's a 50 ohm SWR of 5.6:1 where almost 1/2 of the RF is rejected at the antenna when 50 ohm coax is being used. If the 50 ohm SWR drops below 5.6:1 somewhere else it necessarily must exhibit a higher resistance and reactance than exists at the 9 ohm antenna feedpoint. Moral: There is nothing magic about 50 ohms. If you were using a transmission line with a Z0 of 9 ohms with a 9 ohm SWR meter, you wouldn't notice anything worth reporting. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Minimum gauge for groud... | Shortwave | |||
Minimum gauge for groud... | Shortwave | |||
75 to 50 ohm minimum loss pad | Homebrew | |||
Solar Minimum in 2006? | Shortwave | |||
FA: Swan 350 $15 minimum bid! | Boatanchors |