Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reading here and there that the signals of the on-going DX-expedition to
Glorioso Island are generally very low, I got the curiosity to simulate the so-called "spiderbeam" antenna they are using (sized for the 10-meter band) on EZ-NEC. Doing that, I obtained an unexpected result. The simulated antenna shows a clear SWR minimum at 29.0 MHz where impedance is 76 + j32 ohm. I then checked SWR across the 24 - 34 MHz range with the following results: - going up in range 29 - 34 MHz, the reactance steadily increases (+334 ohm at 34 MHz) - going down in range 29 - 24 MHz, the reactance remains positive and steadily increases up to 28.5 MHz, after which it starts to decrease, until it becomes 0 ohm at 27 MHz, and negative below that frequency. At 27 MHz impedance is 9 + j0 ohm (hence it is the resonant point). I knew that the resonant point does not precisely coincide with the minimum SWR point, but I would not have suspected such a big difference (2 MHz shift at 29 MHz!). Any comment? Tony I0JX Rome, Italy |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Minimum gauge for groud... | Shortwave | |||
Minimum gauge for groud... | Shortwave | |||
75 to 50 ohm minimum loss pad | Homebrew | |||
Solar Minimum in 2006? | Shortwave | |||
FA: Swan 350 $15 minimum bid! | Boatanchors |