Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote in
: As you say, though, there are always tradeoffs. A higher magnetizing current means a lower winding impedance. In a winding connected across a transmission line, this means adding a relatively low shunt impedance across the line. In a series connected winding, as in a current balun, it means less effective choking of common mode current. Maximizing winding impedance, which also minimizes magnetizing current, is always beneficial. But as we've both pointed out, sometimes we're forced to choose a material that gives us less impedance in order to lower the loss to a level that won't cause a problem at high power levels. The price is a smaller shunt winding impedance or less effective common mode choke, and also typically a narrower operating bandwidth. Yes Roy, and none of this has visited impedance transformation... or the departure from ideal transformation that is envisaged by many if not most buyers. Choices for magnetising current and the TL Zo in my model of the R balun affect transformation at the upper and lower frequencies. I know you have pointed out many times that shunting an antenna feed point with a resistor may improved system efficiency. At least one antenna manufacturer uses a lossy ferrite transformer to tame system efficiency in a wideband antenna... the CHA250 comes to mind. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS high power tubes | Equipment | |||
FS high power tubes | Boatanchors | |||
FS high power tubes | Boatanchors | |||
Balun = Power Loss? | Antenna | |||
FA: High Power Tuner | Swap |