Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in message ...
Tom Bruhns wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: alhearn wrote: My question is what determines where that peak occurs? Mathematically, it will be where the SWR circle is tangent to the reactance arc. That is not in general true; do you have reason to believe it's true for the impedance of a dipole? When the dipole is at maximum feedpoint reactance, can the SWR be calculated? Of course. Will that point, when plotted on a Smith Chart lie on the SWR circle? Of course. Will it also lie on a reactance arc? of course. Will the SWR circle be tangent to that reactance arc? Of course. I'm sorry, Cecil, but you lost me there. For any given SWR circle, there are only two (complex conjugate) points at which reactance arcs are tangent. Why would we think that the point of max reactance on the antenna impedance curve will necessarily be at the point of tangency? The antenna impedance arc of the simple dipole I modelled indeed does not lie tangent to the max reactance arc at the same point as the SWR circle that's tangent that reactance arc. In any event, I don't see that this tells us anything about _why_ the dipole shows max reactance at that particular frequency. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |