Richard Clark wrote:

Besides, I offered you simply reduce the number of modulation cycles,
by their count, to reduce the effect to that of one cycle (of
modulation). A pulse is a modulation of one cycle (however poorly
shaped it may be, and it envelopes a pluarity of SHF cycles).


Even though I know you're having some fun here Richard, your division by
pulse assumes that the effects are linear.

- 73 de Mike N3LI -

On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:34:50 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

Even though I know you're having some fun here Richard, your division by
pulse assumes that the effects are linear.

Yes, they are. However, for some members who contribute to this group
insofar as postings about ejected particels and Luxembourg effect,
non-linearities may abound.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:34:50 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

Even though I know you're having some fun here Richard, your division by
pulse assumes that the effects are linear.

Yes, they are. However, for some members who contribute to this group
insofar as postings about ejected particels and Luxembourg effect,
non-linearities may abound.

That gets me to wondering...

Is my theory about RF energy being little turds that fly off an antenna
in agreement or disagreement with those particels?

I'll refresh everyone if they didn't hear it before.

RF energy consists of little packets of waste material, like little
turds, that get ejected from an antenna (as the last link in the chain
as new material flows into the antenna. This is obvious as a
characteristic of conservation of mass as well as general digestion.

These little turds leave the antenna with great velocity. While flying
through the air, they are naturally attracted to other antennas (derived
from holistic like treats like principles) and are therefore received on
other radios.

The result and characteristics of this process are that unless
transmissions match reception, which is almost impossible, the little
turds accumulate on our antennas, and over time result in crappy
performance.

- 73 de Mike N3LI -

On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:38:10 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

Is my theory about RF energy being little turds that fly off an antenna
in agreement or disagreement with those particels?

Yes, particels and these specimens are in fact derived from the same
source.

I'll refresh everyone if they didn't hear it before.

RF energy consists of little packets of waste material, like little
turds, that get ejected from an antenna (as the last link in the chain
as new material flows into the antenna. This is obvious as a
characteristic of conservation of mass as well as general digestion.

One must expand on this to include impedance matching ointments such
as Preparation H (and the lowering of transmission line restriction
losses with Ex-Lax). Can it be said that diamagnetism is like a
greasy lube job for propagation?

These little turds leave the antenna with great velocity. While flying
through the air, they are naturally attracted to other antennas (derived
from holistic like treats like principles) and are therefore received on
other radios.

If they are to be circularly polarized, they will need a corriolis
evacuation.

The result and characteristics of this process are that unless
transmissions match reception, which is almost impossible, the little
turds accumulate on our antennas, and over time result in crappy
performance.

It must be true - evidence AM talk shows.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:38:10 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

Is my theory about RF energy being little turds that fly off an antenna
in agreement or disagreement with those particels?

Yes, particels and these specimens are in fact derived from the same
source.

I'll refresh everyone if they didn't hear it before.

RF energy consists of little packets of waste material, like little
turds, that get ejected from an antenna (as the last link in the chain
as new material flows into the antenna. This is obvious as a
characteristic of conservation of mass as well as general digestion.

One must expand on this to include impedance matching ointments such
as Preparation H (and the lowering of transmission line restriction
losses with Ex-Lax). Can it be said that diamagnetism is like a
greasy lube job for propagation?

These little turds leave the antenna with great velocity. While flying
through the air, they are naturally attracted to other antennas (derived
from holistic like treats like principles) and are therefore received on
other radios.

If they are to be circularly polarized, they will need a corriolis
evacuation.

The result and characteristics of this process are that unless
transmissions match reception, which is almost impossible, the little
turds accumulate on our antennas, and over time result in crappy
performance.

It must be true - evidence AM talk shows.


Dayum, you're Good! I think the theory has had the finishing touches and
is fully formed. This turd is polished!


- 73 de Mike N3LI -

"Richard Clark" wrote
...
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:34:50 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

Even though I know you're having some fun here Richard, your division by
pulse assumes that the effects are linear.

Yes, they are. However, for some members who contribute to this group
insofar as postings about ejected particels and Luxembourg effect,
non-linearities may abound.

I am posting about such antennas:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fileipolentstehung.gif
Whwt is wrong here?
S*