Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White GM3SEK wrote in news:6O1lIpHoLZzKFAM3
@ifwtech.co.uk: .... [1] All credit to DK7ZB for making the point that it's much easier to design high-performance yagis with a feedpoint impedance in the region of 25-30ohms. He feels that increasing the feedpoint impedance to 50 ohms (eg by adding a closely-spaced first director) makes optimization more difficult, ... Absolutely, and designing an effective, efficient, reproduceable matching arrangement is an essential part of system design. Whilst I have reservations about the design pics etc referenced, the fundamentals of the Yagi itself look good, and with an impoved matching / balun element, it looks like a practical high performance antenna. They are certainly becoming more popular in this part of the world where most home brew designs are DL6WU based (for good reasons, but peformance isn't the principle goal). An improved design could persue a more reproduceable balun that had an adequately high shunt impedance on one side of the DE, or better, a symmetric balun, and the shunt impedance was tuned out as part of the DE tuning adjustment. The latter, if done properly, should result in more symmetric current distribution on the DE, and pattern closer to that modelled. On that point, I am often somewhat amused at the out of hand dismissal of gamma matches because of pattern distortion, and recommendation of asymmetric baluns in their place. Symmetric baluns are just not very popular with hams on VHF and UHF. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
THE DX TRANSMISSION RADIOCRONACHE N.5 IS ON LINE | Swap | |||
Need help on How to test transmission line | Antenna | |||
Transmission Line | Antenna | |||
(yet another) transmission line question | Antenna |