Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Cecil Moore
writes Szczepan Białek wrote: It is a history: "In the early days of lightning conductors, I believe that the French didn't like the nasty pointy things which the British had installed. Instead, they decorated theirs with fancy balls at the top - with sometimes disastrous results. I assume a certain biased reporting of anecdotal evidence.:-) A ball at the top hat of a Tesla coil allows a greater amplitude of voltage to build up before arcing than does a point at the top. Therefo Points should result in more lightning strikes at lower voltages. Balls should result in fewer lightning strikes at lower voltages. Did you mean 'higher'? Can't think of any valid reason why either design should be able to avoid the really big one. Surely, when lightning is about, points allow an essentially continuous discharge at a low current, while balls allow the voltage to build up and up, until there is a big 'splat'? -- Ian |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna ground or rig ground? | Antenna | |||
Experiment With A Copper Ground Pipe Antenna -by- Gerry Vassilatos plus The Geomantic Antenna Group on YAHOO ! | Shortwave | |||
Ground Or Not To Ground Receiving Antenna In Storm ? | Antenna | |||
Antenna Ground | Antenna | |||
Antenna Ground | Antenna |