Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 11, 10:41*am, Bill wrote:
fromhttp://unwinantennas.com/: "The Sun is very hot because it is burning. Burning as we know it produces soot and other by products in abundance that when these particles collect in the air they become visual to the eye as smoke even tho the particles themselves are invisible to the eye unless there is a contrast in light as with particles passing thru a shaft of light thru a window." Does the author not understand the difference between fusion and combustion? Why would anyone pay attention to such an ignoramus when he writes about antenna theory? The term "soot" defines the presence of particles that still contain energy when dispelled from a chemical exchange process. In the case of escape from the Sun's internal processes it must be recognized that ejected particles still contain energy in nuclear form as well as vector forces applied by the boundary equilibrium breaking form of a leverage action. The mechanics of what happens within the Sun's boundary is not as important as the recognition of the equilibrium breaking vectors when reviewing what I see as the initial carrier of radiation in the form of an "accelerated charge". True, my spelling is not in accordance with the rules of the english language but languages used other than english cannot be automatically dismissed as drivel unless correctly translated as such. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"WRONG-DOOR" MOPEADOPE THE PEANUT BRAINED GENIUS | CB | |||
Genius At Riverhead - H.H. Beverage Book | Shortwave | |||
FA: Genius At Riverhead-H.H. Beverage | Swap | |||
FA: Genius At Riverhead-H.H. Beverage | Swap | |||
FA: Genius At Riverhead-H.H. Beverage | Swap |