On Nov 11, 10:41*am, Bill wrote:
fromhttp://unwinantennas.com/:

"The Sun is very hot because it is burning. Burning as we know it
produces soot and other by products in abundance that when these
particles collect in the air they become visual to the eye as smoke
even tho the particles themselves are invisible to the eye unless
there is a contrast in light as with particles passing thru a shaft of
light thru a window."

Does the author not understand the difference between fusion and
combustion? Why would anyone pay attention to such an ignoramus when
he writes about antenna theory?

The term "soot" defines the presence of particles that still contain
energy when dispelled from a chemical exchange process. In the case of
escape from the Sun's internal processes it must be recognized that
ejected particles still contain energy in nuclear form as well as
vector forces applied by the boundary equilibrium breaking form of a
leverage action.
The mechanics of what happens within the Sun's boundary is not as
important as the recognition of the equilibrium breaking vectors when
reviewing what I see as the initial carrier of radiation in the form
of an "accelerated charge". True, my spelling is not in accordance
with the rules of the english language but languages used other than
english
cannot be automatically dismissed as drivel unless correctly
translated as such.