On Dec 6, 11:02*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Dec 6, 2:52*pm, Art Unwin wrote:





On Dec 6, 1:10*pm, Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 some gomer wrote:

No where does Maxwell's equations suggests a particular shape or
elevation or even straght when describing a radiator

Hmmmm,

Did Maxwell design antennas? *Did he describe them? *If he had no
particular shape in mind, did that mean it was a mesh like a fish net
cast over the rocks? *Did he try working the international space
station with this limp radiator powered by the feeble force?

WWMD?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Maxwell dealt only with the mathematics of the time where many people
had arrived at equations with respect to scientific observations.
Many of these equations from different countries were actually
duplicates so he was able to side line some. reduce some and even
combined some such that he has a set of equations. Ofcourse he was
aware that with observations within the Universe one must obey the
requirement of equilibrium. You can do this by placing all metrics on
one side of the equal or equal ibrium side and zero ion the other
side.
One of his final equations did not, in fact, equal zero and in fact
the metric of time was missing among other things. Now he couldn't go
back to Gauss or anybody for an explanation. If he had spoken to Gauss
he may have told him that if he made a static field dynamic he could
correct the initial equations provided as the product was one and the
same! Instead Maxwell concerned himself only with the metrics of the
equations and not the scale. So he cancelled the metrics that were
available and then added some metrics so he could cancel what was
remaining which implied equil ibrium noy knowing what the additions
added signified. At that time he could not have cared less as he
primarily a mathematician.
When Yagi and Uda came along they stumbled on intercoupling of planar
forms with out any regard to Maxwells equations. For them, the use of
half wave length was of no concern as it provided answers that
were within 10% of real life. That aproach lasted to this very day
when I came along and pointed out that by using the Gaussian law of
statics
they could then account for the remaining 10% of radiation by
accounting for other forces which could provide for 100% efficiency.
When this observation was shared on the internet it met with disdain
by those who in the absence of knoweledge followed the trend of the
written books of science known for their plagarisms. After all, those
who followed the books to the letter were resting on the mantle of
perceived experts where all agreed on the same thing. Rather than
learning new things about physics they decided to agree to bestow on
the teacher the myth that he was wearing no clothes and threw away all
the mesh available . To this day nobody can apply a time varying field
and note that it radiated more efficiently than any radiater known and
occupy a smaller volume than previously .possible thus preventing
those with small gardens become such loud mouths as others *were that
were preventing the advance of science.
Now the antenna industry realizes that with the gaussian knowledge
being denied to them the only resort they had for advancement was to
invent a new technology so they could carry the battle to those who
cannot accept change. Unfortunately God made only one technology for
radiation leaving the industry to ponder for another 100 years.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg

Ofcourse the biggest thing to come from the Gaussian observation was
that his static particles must be in equilibrium and also could only
come to rest without harm was a diamagnetic material which could
encapsulate vie their density. Most other things on earth are
considered diamagnetic including water. Many people have seen beads of
water that can exist in a pherical shape as you see with mercury and
the like. This is because the liquid is bound so tight by the resting
particles that they assume the shape of a sphere where internal
pressure equates to the outside pressure. When the winds pick up
particles are drawn up while clinging to the water where the surface
area of water diminishes with altitude The resting electrons or
particles receive a charge via the assending movement while at the
same time struggle to look for a viable new resting place such as a
close by cloud while all the time gathering increased charge. These
electrons collect in a cloud like form themselves as points of rest
diminish such they are attracted away from the higher elevation back
to earth which is now the easiest place to reach and rest. Thus we
have lightning produced when the cloud of electrons hit the ground
such that the charge removes itself from the charge.
You might also notice that the radiation resistance increases as the
metallic resistance decreases. This is due to the encapsulating
electrons carry more and more of the current available such that the
skin depth starts to disapear such that we have to review what the
lowest impedance that can be handled for radiatiation. The action that
removes the encapsulating particles is both a directive force and one
of spin. These same two forces are responsible for all actions on
earth such as gravity associated with spin all the way back to the big
bang where equilibrium is broken via a emerging particle from the suns
boundary. So what was originall thought of as being a wave is now seen
as a total error as the particle is the initial subject of force
together with spin which thus brings to the fore the formation of
voltage, light magnetism and even gravity byt he adherance to Newtons
law that require s from every action an equal and opposite reaction
which travels thru the Universe by the single ejection of a particle
creating the two basic forces from which everything comes about. Even
the Faraday shield follows the same pattern where the field outside
equals the field inside until the internal or external equilibrium is
broken creating the same two originating forces of the universe. Now
if I made all that up myself wouldn't one think of me as a visionary
that really should write a physics book to steer the world in the
right direction of fictional law?
Had a great long week end in StLouis which has revitalised me back
home in Central Illinois to with stand the new oncomming insults who
feel that they know all about antennas before I was born.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Lets make sure I follow, You are saying that radio communication
occurs because and antenna emits statically charged particle that then
imparts their charge to the receiving antenna when they strike the
antenna. Is this what you are saying.


Jimmie

On Dec 7, 1:35*pm, JIMMIE wrote:
On Dec 6, 11:02*pm, Art Unwin wrote:



On Dec 6, 2:52*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Dec 6, 1:10*pm, Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 some gomer wrote:

No where does Maxwell's equations suggests a particular shape or
elevation or even straght when describing a radiator

Hmmmm,

Did Maxwell design antennas? *Did he describe them? *If he had no
particular shape in mind, did that mean it was a mesh like a fish net
cast over the rocks? *Did he try working the international space
station with this limp radiator powered by the feeble force?

WWMD?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Maxwell dealt only with the mathematics of the time where many people
had arrived at equations with respect to scientific observations.
Many of these equations from different countries were actually
duplicates so he was able to side line some. reduce some and even
combined some such that he has a set of equations. Ofcourse he was
aware that with observations within the Universe one must obey the
requirement of equilibrium. You can do this by placing all metrics on
one side of the equal or equal ibrium side and zero ion the other
side.
One of his final equations did not, in fact, equal zero and in fact
the metric of time was missing among other things. Now he couldn't go
back to Gauss or anybody for an explanation. If he had spoken to Gauss
he may have told him that if he made a static field dynamic he could
correct the initial equations provided as the product was one and the
same! Instead Maxwell concerned himself only with the metrics of the
equations and not the scale. So he cancelled the metrics that were
available and then added some metrics so he could cancel what was
remaining which implied equil ibrium noy knowing what the additions
added signified. At that time he could not have cared less as he
primarily a mathematician.
When Yagi and Uda came along they stumbled on intercoupling of planar
forms with out any regard to Maxwells equations. For them, the use of
half wave length was of no concern as it provided answers that
were within 10% of real life. That aproach lasted to this very day
when I came along and pointed out that by using the Gaussian law of
statics
they could then account for the remaining 10% of radiation by
accounting for other forces which could provide for 100% efficiency.
When this observation was shared on the internet it met with disdain
by those who in the absence of knoweledge followed the trend of the
written books of science known for their plagarisms. After all, those
who followed the books to the letter were resting on the mantle of
perceived experts where all agreed on the same thing. Rather than
learning new things about physics they decided to agree to bestow on
the teacher the myth that he was wearing no clothes and threw away all
the mesh available . To this day nobody can apply a time varying field
and note that it radiated more efficiently than any radiater known and
occupy a smaller volume than previously .possible thus preventing
those with small gardens become such loud mouths as others *were that
were preventing the advance of science.
Now the antenna industry realizes that with the gaussian knowledge
being denied to them the only resort they had for advancement was to
invent a new technology so they could carry the battle to those who
cannot accept change. Unfortunately God made only one technology for
radiation leaving the industry to ponder for another 100 years.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg

Ofcourse the biggest thing to come from the Gaussian observation was
that his static particles must be in equilibrium and also could only
come to rest without harm was a diamagnetic material which could
encapsulate vie their density. Most other things on earth are
considered diamagnetic including water. Many people have seen beads of
water that can exist in a pherical shape as you see with mercury and
the like. This is because the liquid is bound so tight by the resting
particles that they assume the shape of a sphere where internal
pressure equates to the outside pressure. When the winds pick up
particles are drawn up while clinging to the water where the surface
area of water diminishes with altitude The resting electrons or
particles receive a charge via the assending movement while at the
same time struggle to look for a viable new resting place such as a
close by cloud while all the time gathering increased charge. These
electrons collect in a cloud like form themselves as points of rest
diminish such they are attracted away from the higher elevation back
to earth which is now the easiest place to reach and rest. Thus we
have lightning produced when the cloud of electrons hit the ground
such that the charge removes itself from the charge.
You might also notice that the radiation resistance increases as the
metallic resistance decreases. This is due to the encapsulating
electrons carry more and more of the current available such that the
skin depth starts to disapear such that we have to review what the
lowest impedance that can be handled for radiatiation. The action that
removes the encapsulating particles is both a directive force and one
of spin. These same two forces are responsible for all actions on
earth such as gravity associated with spin all the way back to the big
bang where equilibrium is broken via a emerging particle from the suns
boundary. So what was originall thought of as being a wave is now seen
as a total error as the particle is the initial subject of force
together with spin which thus brings to the fore the formation of
voltage, light magnetism and even gravity byt he adherance to Newtons
law that require s from every action an equal and opposite reaction
which travels thru the Universe by the single ejection of a particle
creating the two basic forces from which everything comes about. Even
the Faraday shield follows the same pattern where the field outside
equals the field inside until the internal or external equilibrium is
broken creating the same two originating forces of the universe. Now
if I made all that up myself wouldn't one think of me as a visionary
that really should write a physics book to steer the world in the
right direction of fictional law?
Had a great long week end in StLouis which has revitalised me back
home in Central Illinois to with stand the new oncomming insults who
feel that they know all about antennas before I was born.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Lets make sure I follow, You are saying that radio communication
occurs because and antenna emits statically charged particle that then
imparts their charge to the receiving antenna when they strike the
antenna. Is this what you are saying.

Jimmie

yup

On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:35:16 -0800 (PST), JIMMIE
wrote:

Lets make sure I follow, You are saying that radio communication
occurs because and antenna emits statically charged particle that then
imparts their charge to the receiving antenna when they strike the
antenna. Is this what you are saying.

Let's see, dust or soot are particles and can be charged. The VOA,
BBC and Deutsche Welle have big, big tranmitters capable of generating
considerable dust storms that have been tracked by satellite since
Gauss was in knee pants.

Well, maybe not.

Electrons are particles that are charged (just one charge, and only
negative), but awfully difficult to rip out of an atom without a few
KV (doesn't sound like an HT will be up to the job, so despite
evidence to the contrary - all lies - HTs do not work UNLESS their
antenna has a filament, screen grid, and a surrounding plate with an
opposite charge of several hundred volts).

Photons are particles (maybe) that are NOT charged, otherwise if when
you rub a balloon (diamagnetic material) on your hair (diamagnetic
material), it (diamagnetic material) would glow like a night light
instead of attracting, um, dust (diamagnetic material) and soot
(diamagnetic material) with its feeble force.

As antennas are not diamagnetic material - contrary to experience, all
lies - then antennas do not work UNLESS you have photographic proof of
a soot or dust layer coating one (aka skin-depth).

I hope this helps.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Dec 7, 2:03*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Dec 7, 1:35*pm, JIMMIE wrote:



On Dec 6, 11:02*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Dec 6, 2:52*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Dec 6, 1:10*pm, Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 some gomer wrote:

No where does Maxwell's equations suggests a particular shape or
elevation or even straght when describing a radiator

Hmmmm,

Did Maxwell design antennas? *Did he describe them? *If he had no
particular shape in mind, did that mean it was a mesh like a fish net
cast over the rocks? *Did he try working the international space
station with this limp radiator powered by the feeble force?

WWMD?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Maxwell dealt only with the mathematics of the time where many people
had arrived at equations with respect to scientific observations.
Many of these equations from different countries were actually
duplicates so he was able to side line some. reduce some and even
combined some such that he has a set of equations. Ofcourse he was
aware that with observations within the Universe one must obey the
requirement of equilibrium. You can do this by placing all metrics on
one side of the equal or equal ibrium side and zero ion the other
side.
One of his final equations did not, in fact, equal zero and in fact
the metric of time was missing among other things. Now he couldn't go
back to Gauss or anybody for an explanation. If he had spoken to Gauss
he may have told him that if he made a static field dynamic he could
correct the initial equations provided as the product was one and the
same! Instead Maxwell concerned himself only with the metrics of the
equations and not the scale. So he cancelled the metrics that were
available and then added some metrics so he could cancel what was
remaining which implied equil ibrium noy knowing what the additions
added signified. At that time he could not have cared less as he
primarily a mathematician.
When Yagi and Uda came along they stumbled on intercoupling of planar
forms with out any regard to Maxwells equations. For them, the use of
half wave length was of no concern as it provided answers that
were within 10% of real life. That aproach lasted to this very day
when I came along and pointed out that by using the Gaussian law of
statics
they could then account for the remaining 10% of radiation by
accounting for other forces which could provide for 100% efficiency..
When this observation was shared on the internet it met with disdain
by those who in the absence of knoweledge followed the trend of the
written books of science known for their plagarisms. After all, those
who followed the books to the letter were resting on the mantle of
perceived experts where all agreed on the same thing. Rather than
learning new things about physics they decided to agree to bestow on
the teacher the myth that he was wearing no clothes and threw away all
the mesh available . To this day nobody can apply a time varying field
and note that it radiated more efficiently than any radiater known and
occupy a smaller volume than previously .possible thus preventing
those with small gardens become such loud mouths as others *were that
were preventing the advance of science.
Now the antenna industry realizes that with the gaussian knowledge
being denied to them the only resort they had for advancement was to
invent a new technology so they could carry the battle to those who
cannot accept change. Unfortunately God made only one technology for
radiation leaving the industry to ponder for another 100 years.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg

Ofcourse the biggest thing to come from the Gaussian observation was
that his static particles must be in equilibrium and also could only
come to rest without harm was a diamagnetic material which could
encapsulate vie their density. Most other things on earth are
considered diamagnetic including water. Many people have seen beads of
water that can exist in a pherical shape as you see with mercury and
the like. This is because the liquid is bound so tight by the resting
particles that they assume the shape of a sphere where internal
pressure equates to the outside pressure. When the winds pick up
particles are drawn up while clinging to the water where the surface
area of water diminishes with altitude The resting electrons or
particles receive a charge via the assending movement while at the
same time struggle to look for a viable new resting place such as a
close by cloud while all the time gathering increased charge. These
electrons collect in a cloud like form themselves as points of rest
diminish such they are attracted away from the higher elevation back
to earth which is now the easiest place to reach and rest. Thus we
have lightning produced when the cloud of electrons hit the ground
such that the charge removes itself from the charge.
You might also notice that the radiation resistance increases as the
metallic resistance decreases. This is due to the encapsulating
electrons carry more and more of the current available such that the
skin depth starts to disapear such that we have to review what the
lowest impedance that can be handled for radiatiation. The action that
removes the encapsulating particles is both a directive force and one
of spin. These same two forces are responsible for all actions on
earth such as gravity associated with spin all the way back to the big
bang where equilibrium is broken via a emerging particle from the suns
boundary. So what was originall thought of as being a wave is now seen
as a total error as the particle is the initial subject of force
together with spin which thus brings to the fore the formation of
voltage, light magnetism and even gravity byt he adherance to Newtons
law that require s from every action an equal and opposite reaction
which travels thru the Universe by the single ejection of a particle
creating the two basic forces from which everything comes about. Even
the Faraday shield follows the same pattern where the field outside
equals the field inside until the internal or external equilibrium is
broken creating the same two originating forces of the universe. Now
if I made all that up myself wouldn't one think of me as a visionary
that really should write a physics book to steer the world in the
right direction of fictional law?
Had a great long week end in StLouis which has revitalised me back
home in Central Illinois to with stand the new oncomming insults who
feel that they know all about antennas before I was born.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Lets make sure I follow, You are saying that radio communication
occurs because and antenna emits statically charged particle that then
imparts their charge to the receiving antenna when they strike the
antenna. Is this what you are saying.

Jimmie

yup

When you apply a time varying current to a radiator you arrive at an
impedance derived by two resistances. Radiation resistance and skin
resistance.
The more efficient the radiator becomes the less skin resistance depth
is used where the loss is added to the radiation resistance. When the
current ceases to flow within the radiator resistance the radiation
resistance becomes a maximum which is what we seek. This suggests
that maximum radiation is created by current that flows outside the
metallic member and underneath the encapsulating particle or unbound
electron. With the current flowing along the joint of the materials 2
forces are applied underneath the encapsulating electrons.
These two forces are the same as gravity and the rotation of the
earth.
In a time varying current these same two forces are represented by
displacement current encircling a static field in eddy current form.
The twistin g action applies a poealing action on the unbound electron
and the displacement current supplies the ejection force the result of
which
is a straight line projection with spin impressed on the electron.
Now we know that radiation is created by an accelerating charge so we
must consider where the acceleration comes from. When the electron is
launched it passes thru the afore mentioned static fieldwhich is being
interfered with by a field at right angles to the main current flow.
When the particle enteres the static field in the area the external
field is impinged upon the electron or particle is placed into an
acceleration mode until it clears the static field where it achieves a
speed which incidently was found to be the same as that measured for
light. Now the electron which is now charged follows a straight line
projection of mass with spin and a generated electrical field. It is
now a particle or electron back into its original mode looking for a
place to rest which means it is looking for a diamagnetic material
that is resonant, the part that an amatuer has directed it at. It
arrives at the receiving antenna with a thump dislodging existing
particles where it disposers its electrical field upon the receiving
radiator for processing
in a mirror actions to that taken on transmission.
This single electron is a exact example of point radiation which can
be seen as an ejection from a point source containing distributed
loads
Note that the particles projection is of a straight line without
effect from gravity as it is exhibiting the reacting forces around
earth(gravity and rotation in line with Newtons equations. This
actually became into being when a particle of the sun impinged on its
barrier thus breaking equilibrium with both a direct force and a
bending or spin force now known as the BIG BANG. These same two forces
generate all the vector forces that exist in the universe such as
gravity, electricity, magnetism etc as well as the well known ribbon
with a helical action that represents the DNA of human life.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg (uk)

On Dec 7, 3:03*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Dec 7, 1:35*pm, JIMMIE wrote:





On Dec 6, 11:02*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Dec 6, 2:52*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Dec 6, 1:10*pm, Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 some gomer wrote:

No where does Maxwell's equations suggests a particular shape or
elevation or even straght when describing a radiator

Hmmmm,

Did Maxwell design antennas? *Did he describe them? *If he had no
particular shape in mind, did that mean it was a mesh like a fish net
cast over the rocks? *Did he try working the international space
station with this limp radiator powered by the feeble force?

WWMD?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Maxwell dealt only with the mathematics of the time where many people
had arrived at equations with respect to scientific observations.
Many of these equations from different countries were actually
duplicates so he was able to side line some. reduce some and even
combined some such that he has a set of equations. Ofcourse he was
aware that with observations within the Universe one must obey the
requirement of equilibrium. You can do this by placing all metrics on
one side of the equal or equal ibrium side and zero ion the other
side.
One of his final equations did not, in fact, equal zero and in fact
the metric of time was missing among other things. Now he couldn't go
back to Gauss or anybody for an explanation. If he had spoken to Gauss
he may have told him that if he made a static field dynamic he could
correct the initial equations provided as the product was one and the
same! Instead Maxwell concerned himself only with the metrics of the
equations and not the scale. So he cancelled the metrics that were
available and then added some metrics so he could cancel what was
remaining which implied equil ibrium noy knowing what the additions
added signified. At that time he could not have cared less as he
primarily a mathematician.
When Yagi and Uda came along they stumbled on intercoupling of planar
forms with out any regard to Maxwells equations. For them, the use of
half wave length was of no concern as it provided answers that
were within 10% of real life. That aproach lasted to this very day
when I came along and pointed out that by using the Gaussian law of
statics
they could then account for the remaining 10% of radiation by
accounting for other forces which could provide for 100% efficiency..
When this observation was shared on the internet it met with disdain
by those who in the absence of knoweledge followed the trend of the
written books of science known for their plagarisms. After all, those
who followed the books to the letter were resting on the mantle of
perceived experts where all agreed on the same thing. Rather than
learning new things about physics they decided to agree to bestow on
the teacher the myth that he was wearing no clothes and threw away all
the mesh available . To this day nobody can apply a time varying field
and note that it radiated more efficiently than any radiater known and
occupy a smaller volume than previously .possible thus preventing
those with small gardens become such loud mouths as others *were that
were preventing the advance of science.
Now the antenna industry realizes that with the gaussian knowledge
being denied to them the only resort they had for advancement was to
invent a new technology so they could carry the battle to those who
cannot accept change. Unfortunately God made only one technology for
radiation leaving the industry to ponder for another 100 years.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg

Ofcourse the biggest thing to come from the Gaussian observation was
that his static particles must be in equilibrium and also could only
come to rest without harm was a diamagnetic material which could
encapsulate vie their density. Most other things on earth are
considered diamagnetic including water. Many people have seen beads of
water that can exist in a pherical shape as you see with mercury and
the like. This is because the liquid is bound so tight by the resting
particles that they assume the shape of a sphere where internal
pressure equates to the outside pressure. When the winds pick up
particles are drawn up while clinging to the water where the surface
area of water diminishes with altitude The resting electrons or
particles receive a charge via the assending movement while at the
same time struggle to look for a viable new resting place such as a
close by cloud while all the time gathering increased charge. These
electrons collect in a cloud like form themselves as points of rest
diminish such they are attracted away from the higher elevation back
to earth which is now the easiest place to reach and rest. Thus we
have lightning produced when the cloud of electrons hit the ground
such that the charge removes itself from the charge.
You might also notice that the radiation resistance increases as the
metallic resistance decreases. This is due to the encapsulating
electrons carry more and more of the current available such that the
skin depth starts to disapear such that we have to review what the
lowest impedance that can be handled for radiatiation. The action that
removes the encapsulating particles is both a directive force and one
of spin. These same two forces are responsible for all actions on
earth such as gravity associated with spin all the way back to the big
bang where equilibrium is broken via a emerging particle from the suns
boundary. So what was originall thought of as being a wave is now seen
as a total error as the particle is the initial subject of force
together with spin which thus brings to the fore the formation of
voltage, light magnetism and even gravity byt he adherance to Newtons
law that require s from every action an equal and opposite reaction
which travels thru the Universe by the single ejection of a particle
creating the two basic forces from which everything comes about. Even
the Faraday shield follows the same pattern where the field outside
equals the field inside until the internal or external equilibrium is
broken creating the same two originating forces of the universe. Now
if I made all that up myself wouldn't one think of me as a visionary
that really should write a physics book to steer the world in the
right direction of fictional law?
Had a great long week end in StLouis which has revitalised me back
home in Central Illinois to with stand the new oncomming insults who
feel that they know all about antennas before I was born.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Lets make sure I follow, You are saying that radio communication
occurs because and antenna emits statically charged particle that then
imparts their charge to the receiving antenna when they strike the
antenna. Is this what you are saying.

Jimmie

yup- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Exactly which particles are you saying are responsible for this?.

Jimmie

On Dec 7, 4:16*pm, JIMMIE wrote:
On Dec 7, 3:03*pm, Art Unwin wrote:



On Dec 7, 1:35*pm, JIMMIE wrote:

On Dec 6, 11:02*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Dec 6, 2:52*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Dec 6, 1:10*pm, Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 some gomer wrote:

No where does Maxwell's equations suggests a particular shape or
elevation or even straght when describing a radiator

Hmmmm,

Did Maxwell design antennas? *Did he describe them? *If he had no
particular shape in mind, did that mean it was a mesh like a fish net
cast over the rocks? *Did he try working the international space
station with this limp radiator powered by the feeble force?

WWMD?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Maxwell dealt only with the mathematics of the time where many people
had arrived at equations with respect to scientific observations.
Many of these equations from different countries were actually
duplicates so he was able to side line some. reduce some and even
combined some such that he has a set of equations. Ofcourse he was
aware that with observations within the Universe one must obey the
requirement of equilibrium. You can do this by placing all metrics on
one side of the equal or equal ibrium side and zero ion the other
side.
One of his final equations did not, in fact, equal zero and in fact
the metric of time was missing among other things. Now he couldn't go
back to Gauss or anybody for an explanation. If he had spoken to Gauss
he may have told him that if he made a static field dynamic he could
correct the initial equations provided as the product was one and the
same! Instead Maxwell concerned himself only with the metrics of the
equations and not the scale. So he cancelled the metrics that were
available and then added some metrics so he could cancel what was
remaining which implied equil ibrium noy knowing what the additions
added signified. At that time he could not have cared less as he
primarily a mathematician.
When Yagi and Uda came along they stumbled on intercoupling of planar
forms with out any regard to Maxwells equations. For them, the use of
half wave length was of no concern as it provided answers that
were within 10% of real life. That aproach lasted to this very day
when I came along and pointed out that by using the Gaussian law of
statics
they could then account for the remaining 10% of radiation by
accounting for other forces which could provide for 100% efficiency.
When this observation was shared on the internet it met with disdain
by those who in the absence of knoweledge followed the trend of the
written books of science known for their plagarisms. After all, those
who followed the books to the letter were resting on the mantle of
perceived experts where all agreed on the same thing. Rather than
learning new things about physics they decided to agree to bestow on
the teacher the myth that he was wearing no clothes and threw away all
the mesh available . To this day nobody can apply a time varying field
and note that it radiated more efficiently than any radiater known and
occupy a smaller volume than previously .possible thus preventing
those with small gardens become such loud mouths as others *were that
were preventing the advance of science.
Now the antenna industry realizes that with the gaussian knowledge
being denied to them the only resort they had for advancement was to
invent a new technology so they could carry the battle to those who
cannot accept change. Unfortunately God made only one technology for
radiation leaving the industry to ponder for another 100 years.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg

Ofcourse the biggest thing to come from the Gaussian observation was
that his static particles must be in equilibrium and also could only
come to rest without harm was a diamagnetic material which could
encapsulate vie their density. Most other things on earth are
considered diamagnetic including water. Many people have seen beads of
water that can exist in a pherical shape as you see with mercury and
the like. This is because the liquid is bound so tight by the resting
particles that they assume the shape of a sphere where internal
pressure equates to the outside pressure. When the winds pick up
particles are drawn up while clinging to the water where the surface
area of water diminishes with altitude The resting electrons or
particles receive a charge via the assending movement while at the
same time struggle to look for a viable new resting place such as a
close by cloud while all the time gathering increased charge. These
electrons collect in a cloud like form themselves as points of rest
diminish such they are attracted away from the higher elevation back
to earth which is now the easiest place to reach and rest. Thus we
have lightning produced when the cloud of electrons hit the ground
such that the charge removes itself from the charge.
You might also notice that the radiation resistance increases as the
metallic resistance decreases. This is due to the encapsulating
electrons carry more and more of the current available such that the
skin depth starts to disapear such that we have to review what the
lowest impedance that can be handled for radiatiation. The action that
removes the encapsulating particles is both a directive force and one
of spin. These same two forces are responsible for all actions on
earth such as gravity associated with spin all the way back to the big
bang where equilibrium is broken via a emerging particle from the suns
boundary. So what was originall thought of as being a wave is now seen
as a total error as the particle is the initial subject of force
together with spin which thus brings to the fore the formation of
voltage, light magnetism and even gravity byt he adherance to Newtons
law that require s from every action an equal and opposite reaction
which travels thru the Universe by the single ejection of a particle
creating the two basic forces from which everything comes about. Even
the Faraday shield follows the same pattern where the field outside
equals the field inside until the internal or external equilibrium is
broken creating the same two originating forces of the universe. Now
if I made all that up myself wouldn't one think of me as a visionary
that really should write a physics book to steer the world in the
right direction of fictional law?
Had a great long week end in StLouis which has revitalised me back
home in Central Illinois to with stand the new oncomming insults who
feel that they know all about antennas before I was born.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Lets make sure I follow, You are saying that radio communication
occurs because and antenna emits statically charged particle that then
imparts their charge to the receiving antenna when they strike the
antenna. Is this what you are saying.

Jimmie

yup- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Exactly which particles are you saying are responsible for this?.

Jimmie

Hard to say. We know what is termed as Leptons which escape from the
sun and get taken along in the solar stream towards earth.Some where
along the line they apparently finish up as neutrinos.
What happens between these events is considered to be Higgs field
which creates change in the particles. Then there is the connection to
light and supposed photons which initially attached to particles and
we know that when the particles from the solar stream provide charge
to the earths magnetic boundary. But these are just dots in the story
that wait to be connected but there are many things unknown between
the points that we theoretically know of which we have no evidence.
At the moment we have the observations of the masters and to this day
there is contraversy about particles, waves and the emmission of light
where the masters observations and equations are still a question of
discussion. What I have done is to use the equations of the masters
and connected them in a different mathematical way such they provide
tracable links between the BIG BANG, the Standard model and radiation
that matches the computer derivitatation of
radiation that is in sync with the teachings of the masters especially
Maxwell, Gauss and of course the Faraday shield, all of which now seem
to fit together nicely. The true bottom line is that the use of
Maxwells equations where accountability is taken of all forces
involved
have in essense via computer programs provide authenticity to the idea
of point radiation which leads to efficient small volume antennas.
And following these edicts I have been able to make radiators of a
smnaller volume that is known in the present state of the art.

i don't care if this guy is a troll or an idiot... keep him going, its
great stuff.

still rotflmao

On Dec 7, 5:20*pm, Dave wrote:
i don't care if this guy is a troll or an idiot... keep him going, its
great stuff.

still rotflmao

If one would just read in succession the posts above one might get the
impression that I sat at a desk while in deep thought until I
connected the dots which provided a exp-lanation of radiation where
the books stated that radiation in itself was not fully understood.
That is so far from the truth. Going to the physics books one can see
examples where the maxwell equations was proven in many ways by the
use of contributingequations. One proof that you don't see is the
gaussian static field as a proof possibly because we had a conflict in
metrics ie cgs and MKS
which possibly authors did not want to use for fear of muddying the
water. From my point of view I saw it as a transition from a static
field to a dynamic field which in itself was swhat Maxwell equations
were showing. Sharing this observation on this group and other places
drew nothing but cat calls because of the sillines of connecting
statics with electricity as presently known. Pursuit via computer
programs and other thoughts regarding equilibrium allowed me to
formulate an array
where equilibrrium was in existance and all elements were resonant in
the form of a full wave. Thus my work on unwinantennas .com began
because I had destroyed some old wives tales. Then the second patent
came where again I focussed on FW antennas to obsolete the idea of
ground planes which I did by folding the FW dipole into an end fed
form but with the question remaining regarding my thoughts on the
standard model. Needless to say it showed that a verticle must be
tipped with respect to ground via the very nature of these two fectors
representing gravity and rotation. Going back to the end fed folded
full wave it can be seen that one could section the FW in calculus
form
in the form of many square circuits. In fact it could be expanded more
into mesh form where a transmitted circuit could be one of many in
parallel and where I was able to measure a resonant point on a small
piece of mesh. Thus the second patent started to grow when I changed a
std helix to where the lumped load was cancelled and introducing the
mesh radiator to a ground mounted form for top band
instead of the requirement for height. Thus multi frequency small
antennas were formed the holy grail of radio.
So that is a rough explanation as to how I got to understand radiation
in a different way from the books where as an engineer I started with
Gauss and Maxwell while placing all written theories to the side lines
and working from first principles as I now saw it. Of course looking
at my home page I made many samples and experiments along the way
where I now have a large Faraday cage radiator on the ground and
making a small loop mesh radiator to insert into the Faraday cage to
emulate velocity increase of a beam as with a fire nozzle and
Bernollis theorems where I can reduce the area of resting for
particles
where the number of particles remains a constant where equilibrium
requires a increase in velocity and a tighter beam.
Regards
Art Unwin...KB89MZ...xg (uk)

Art Unwin wrote:

Hard to say. We know what is termed as Leptons which escape from the
sun and get taken along in the solar stream towards earth.Some where
along the line they apparently finish up as neutrinos.
What happens between these events is considered to be Higgs field
which creates change in the particles. Then there is the connection to
light and supposed photons which initially attached to particles and
we know that when the particles from the solar stream provide charge
to the earths magnetic boundary. But these are just dots in the story
that wait to be connected but there are many things unknown between
the points that we theoretically know of which we have no evidence.
At the moment we have the observations of the masters and to this day
there is contraversy about particles, waves and the emmission of light
where the masters observations and equations are still a question of
discussion. What I have done is to use the equations of the masters
and connected them in a different mathematical way such they provide
tracable links between the BIG BANG, the Standard model and radiation
that matches the computer derivitatation of
radiation that is in sync with the teachings of the masters especially
Maxwell, Gauss and of course the Faraday shield, all of which now seem
to fit together nicely. The true bottom line is that the use of
Maxwells equations where accountability is taken of all forces
involved
have in essense via computer programs provide authenticity to the idea
of point radiation which leads to efficient small volume antennas.
And following these edicts I have been able to make radiators of a
smnaller volume that is known in the present state of the art.

Which all means, according to Lord Art, that an antenna won't radiate in
deep space due to lack of the particles (that he isn't sure of the type
of) won't be available to coat your antenna in the correct manner so
that it will be able to make them leap from it.

Of course if a radio signal consisted of charged particles, like he
claims, you could easily bend a radio signal with a static electric
field or magnetic field, which you can't. Heck you could run a radio
signal around right along with the protons in the Large Hadron Collider.
Except for the fact that you can't.

tom
K0TAR

tom wrote:
Which all means, according to Lord Art, that an antenna won't radiate in
deep space due to lack of the particles (that he isn't sure of the type
of) won't be available to coat your antenna in the correct manner so
that it will be able to make them leap from it.

Of course if a radio signal consisted of charged particles, like he
claims, you could easily bend a radio signal with a static electric
field or magnetic field, which you can't. Heck you could run a radio
signal around right along with the protons in the Large Hadron Collider.
Except for the fact that you can't.

tom
K0TAR

Holy Cow! I've discovered the Holy Grail!

I beat you at your own game Art!

If these antennas work like you say, I should be able to make a beam
antenna to any specifications I'd like with magnets or charged plates.

I hereby claim that an antenna type made with charged plates surrounding
a dipole shall be called the K0TAR Unmodulated Electric Plate Beam
Antenna, and the type with cow magnets surrounding a dipole shall be
called the K0TAR Mystifying Magnetic Beam Antenna. And the type with
charged plates AND cow magnets be called the Super Whizbang
ElectroMagnetic Antenna.

Hmm. That last one could be a problem. Since Art has disproved that
there are really EM waves involved here.

I'll have to think about this some more.

I'll get back to you all later.

tom
K0TAR