LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 09, 12:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Faraday shields and radiation and misinterpretations

On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:37:51 -0600, tom wrote:

Nice explanation Richard. And I had never put together the
squared-squared relationship. That's a powerful thing to know.

I suppose this is why it ends up that a 1/10 lambda opening is
considered the rule of thumb cutoff frequency on a dish.

tom
K0TAR


Hi Tom,

Radiation resistance certainly plummets quickly. Look at all the
tunable loops for HF that are 1 M in size AND made on an herculean
scale. I don't think any are rated at 80M (Rr ~ 5 milliOhms), and
even less so for 160M (Rr ~ 29 microOhms). This is the principle
reason why Art's inventions are doomed to abysmal transmit performance
in that band (the shoe-box sized 160M loop).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Faraday Cage Telamon Shortwave 4 October 30th 05 02:17 AM
Faraday Cage [email protected] Shortwave 2 October 30th 05 12:24 AM
Faraday Cage John Steffes Shortwave 4 October 30th 05 12:19 AM
Faraday Cage [email protected] Shortwave 0 October 29th 05 11:11 PM
Faraday Cage Dale Parfitt Shortwave 1 October 29th 05 05:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017