Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 6, 1:10*pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 some gomer wrote: No where does Maxwell's equations suggests a particular shape or elevation or even straght when describing a radiator Hmmmm, Did Maxwell design antennas? *Did he describe them? *If he had no particular shape in mind, did that mean it was a mesh like a fish net cast over the rocks? *Did he try working the international space station with this limp radiator powered by the feeble force? WWMD? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Maxwell dealt only with the mathematics of the time where many people had arrived at equations with respect to scientific observations. Many of these equations from different countries were actually duplicates so he was able to side line some. reduce some and even combined some such that he has a set of equations. Ofcourse he was aware that with observations within the Universe one must obey the requirement of equilibrium. You can do this by placing all metrics on one side of the equal or equal ibrium side and zero ion the other side. One of his final equations did not, in fact, equal zero and in fact the metric of time was missing among other things. Now he couldn't go back to Gauss or anybody for an explanation. If he had spoken to Gauss he may have told him that if he made a static field dynamic he could correct the initial equations provided as the product was one and the same! Instead Maxwell concerned himself only with the metrics of the equations and not the scale. So he cancelled the metrics that were available and then added some metrics so he could cancel what was remaining which implied equil ibrium noy knowing what the additions added signified. At that time he could not have cared less as he primarily a mathematician. When Yagi and Uda came along they stumbled on intercoupling of planar forms with out any regard to Maxwells equations. For them, the use of half wave length was of no concern as it provided answers that were within 10% of real life. That aproach lasted to this very day when I came along and pointed out that by using the Gaussian law of statics they could then account for the remaining 10% of radiation by accounting for other forces which could provide for 100% efficiency. When this observation was shared on the internet it met with disdain by those who in the absence of knoweledge followed the trend of the written books of science known for their plagarisms. After all, those who followed the books to the letter were resting on the mantle of perceived experts where all agreed on the same thing. Rather than learning new things about physics they decided to agree to bestow on the teacher the myth that he was wearing no clothes and threw away all the mesh available . To this day nobody can apply a time varying field and note that it radiated more efficiently than any radiater known and occupy a smaller volume than previously .possible thus preventing those with small gardens become such loud mouths as others were that were preventing the advance of science. Now the antenna industry realizes that with the gaussian knowledge being denied to them the only resort they had for advancement was to invent a new technology so they could carry the battle to those who cannot accept change. Unfortunately God made only one technology for radiation leaving the industry to ponder for another 100 years. Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave |