Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message . .. Lostgallifreyan wrote in : tom wrote in . net: Lostgallifreyan wrote: Actually it comes out during the TV play and at least one of the books that it's "what is 9 times 6?" Adams denied what many here should quickly figure out. tom K0TAR I never saw that one.. Read the books, but I don't remember that, at least not with much meaning. Maybe just to indicate human capacity for coming up with wrong answers from wrong questions? I doubt he ever spelled out what the real roots were. A good magician doesn't deliberately and publicly spoil the illusion (or in his case, allusion, perhaps). The one thing I'm fairly sure of is that the references were cultural, colloquial, and that's why so many people got it. Without that it might have just been another impenetratable space opera with humour thrown in. Ok, a hint. 9 times 6 IS 42. tom K0TAR Well, I wondered about non-euclidean geometry for a moment, then remembered Greg House saying something about working smart, not hard, and no-one said I couldn't plunder Wikipedia, so.... Actually, before I got there, I wasn't even sure if what Adams had denied was that "six times nine equals thirteen is wrong", or that he denied the more interesting case that it was its correctness in base 13 that explained the 'answer'. Apparently he did deny it. Which doesn't mean it isn't true. ![]() small number that looked ordinary and totally unprofound. Which means that he let whim, i.e. unconscious conditioning hold sway, without attempt to mediate it. Given that the English colloquilasm would never be entirely far from a writer wose native language and culture was English, I stand by my 'theory'. ![]() ever directly questioned about the 'sixes and sevens' thing and denied it. Even then, he would be telling the truth if it hadn't been conscious. MUCH more like he was influence ny this that by base 13, no? Maybe you should get me started on my idea for The Long Dark Teatime Of The Soul, you might like it. ![]() unprompted, is that in this case the allusion isn't English, it's French. I also found this: "Stephen Fry, a friend of Adams, claims that Adams told him "exactly why 42", and that the reason is[12] "fascinating, extraordinary and, when you think hard about it, completely obvious." However, Fry says that he has vowed not to tell anyone the secret, and that it must go with him to the grave." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrases_from_The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_the_Galax y I have never met Stephen Fry, and I suspect he wouldn't confirm my idea if I did ask him, but it would fit, given the way thoughts run if you ponder it for a while. Considering the phrase "all at sixes and sevens" in the context of the way HHGTTG works is revealing to the point that even if it really were the original basis, I wouldn't consider it a spoiler if I'd been told either before or after thinking of it for myself. Can't help wondering when people are going to talk about antennas again. ![]() A 42 metre long, inverted V, fed through an ATU makes for an effective and cheap all band antenna, although perhaps not the ultimate antenna. :-) Perhaps an antenna array mounted 42 metres above ground? That would be some tower system to have in the backyard. Mike G0ULI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Partical and Wave duality explained | Policy | |||
Partical and Wave duality explained | General | |||
Partical and Wave duality explained | Policy | |||
Partical and Wave duality explained | General | |||
Partical and Wave duality explained | General |