Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:04Â*am, wrote: Art Unwin wrote: Now physics forums have moderators with the power to ban questions that challenge existing laws (waves) where as the questions and the poster can be censored and banned. Umm, no. The moderated groups just don't want to be bothered by drooling crackpots and raving mental patients. If someone attempts to post something that has data and math to back up a new idea, it will get posted. If someone attempts to post a bunch of rambling nonsense, it won't. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- It depends on what they consider "nonsense". In my case they quoted QED as being final, so I then tried to see what definition they had on "waves" to see what the property they saw symbolized waves such as helical waves, but they declined to discuss. Or in other words you attempted to post a bunch of ramblings about "helical waves" without any results or math and expected them to spoon feed you the contents of generally available texts such as "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" by Richard Feynman. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! | Antenna | |||
Stevie the censor | Policy | |||
the 'language' of physics GOSPELS FAR FROM THE TRUTH --Mor... | Shortwave | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |