Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Antenna
>
RG-58 compared to RG-174
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
10
March 29th 04, 03:59 AM
greg z
Posts: n/a
From: Jim Weir
Date: 3/28/04 1:04 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id:
Why would you do that? Solid has less loss. If you are worried about it
flexing too much and work-hardening (or breaking) the center conductor, use a
strain relief of shrink sleeving at both ends.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------
Solid is fine base applications.
In mobile or portable use it is a failure waiting to happen.
NOT IF----------WHEN--PERIOD
In over 40 years of experience in mobile communications the 2nd thing I check
is the '58 at the pl259.(first being the fuse) 95% of the time broken center
conductor. Funny I've never seen this happen with stranded.
Go Figure
KC*VIF
Greg Z
to thine own sound be true
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole.
Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA
Antenna
8
February 24th 11
10:22 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
03:08 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks