Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:37:33 -0800 (PST), Tom Horne wrote: If I use a dielectric union to connect to the galvanized iron mounting but I still bond both the support pipe and the antenna base to ground can I avoid the galvanic action that already caused the two pipe threads to gall. Hi Tom, Galvanic action occurs at the interface of two dissimilar metals with an electrolyte between them. Each metal/electrolyte combination constitutes a "half cell" with a potential characteristic to that metal. When combined, they form a total potential which supports current flow and metal migration. You can build a chain of such reactions through intermediate steps (a chain of connections); but the current flow still is a product of the electrolyte between them (the half cell chemistry) and if you can break the chain, you break the current and the metal migration. The chemistry is not complex, and it occurs in nature without too much difficulty - hence the problem with weather and poor sealing. A sal****er environment is classically the most brutal. Toss in acid rain too. The solution is fairly simple, but the success of implementation, as the devil, is in details. One simple problem is you may seal the joint or connection from the outside elements, but you may also be sealing the contaminant in with the joint or connection. Now you may observe that two solutions are required. There are a variety of products that can be used to flood the joints to reduce/prevent both these problems. Others will chime in with commercial names and their experience. As there is potential developed, and a current flow, you could in theory detect a bad coupling. Oddly enough, the two metal combination could by absolutely dry, free of contaminants, and still give a voltage indication. This would occur on the basis of a temperature driven migration of current (the Seebeck effect) and you have what is called a thermocouple. This, however, is a very small potential in comparison but could still surprise the investigator. Here, the effect is not chemical but is a heat characteristic of each metal (which means the two metals combine to create the perceived voltage through their individual contributions just as in the galvanic cell). Given that most metal joints in a circuit occupy the same temperature environment there is no potential difference developed. Most technicians consider these potentials as inconsequential (barring the corrosion), but when it comes time to make accurate measurements of small potentials, they can become galling to the patience. One consequence of these interfaces becoming contaminated is that you can also develop a non-linear conductor or a primitive rectifier. If this is a path for RF currents (a common mode from your transmitter) you can generate or receive spurious frequencies. Oh happy day. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Would sacrificial action be appliable? Magnesium blocks are sometimes used to prevent chemical action taking place on less reactive metals electrically connected to them. I'm not sure if it can be applied though, that trick is usually done with grounded (usually buried) blocks to protect pipelines, etc. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cutting non ferrous metals with a table saw | Homebrew | |||
Dissimilar transistors in VHF 55W PA made to work by DC radio pirate | Homebrew | |||
Dissimilar Metal Question | Swap | |||
BUY an auction house -- for precious metals | Shortwave | |||
Antenna mount | Scanner |