Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, phaedrus wrote: Hi again, Well I have read your informative replies on the problems with making a low Zo twin feed with much interest. Clearly it's not really a practical proposition. Shame. So the obvious question is: why are transmitters normalised to 50 ohms when clearly 450 ohms would enable us to enjoy cheaper, do-it- yourself, lower loss feeders? Was this some oversight at the time, or good practice for some obscure reason that I simply cannot think of? As others mentioned, the origin is probably based on military standards. It is my understanding that the lowest loss air dielectric Co-Ax would have an impedance of around 75 Ohms. If you use the same mechanical dimensions but with a polyethylene dielectric, the impedance becomes 52 Ohms. Fred K4DII |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
75 Ohms - It's Not Just For TV Anymore | Shortwave | |||
antenna impedance - calculated 10 - 20 Ohms - measured 36 Ohms?? | Antenna | |||
73 Ohms, How do you get it? | Antenna | |||
DDS 50 ohms buffer ? | Homebrew | |||
DDS 50 ohms buffer ? | Homebrew |