Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
receive polarity
On Feb 14, 11:26*pm, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:51:21 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin wrote: Has there ever been a study *that shows the relative consistency of received signal polarity to see if it would be advantageous for multi polarity receive antennas? Yes. *I did one for a company doing exactly that at various frequencies between 120 to 450Mhz. *Sorry, but I don't have a copy of the report. *For convenience, we use ham frequencies for most of the testing. *What we found is that once a signal is reflected, the reflected signals polarization is fairly random. *There are few flat plate reflectors in both man made and natural objects. *The measured result was a mess of varying polarization angles. You can expect similar results for HF signals reflected off the ionosphere with the added complexity of Faraday rotation. However, it is beneficial to build polarization insensitive antennas. In a common dipole, there's very little loss for polarization mismatch until you get very close to perpendicular. *There, the signal drops off quickly. *Filling in this hole is considered to be a good thing. You can get a crude idea of how it works using an Adcock DF antenna array, or just two cross polarized dipoles. *Since you're not building a direction finder, the crossed dipoles are easier to explain. *Just setup two perpendicular dipoles with the center feeds fairly close together. *Connect two well matched receivers to the two antennas. Connect the IF or audio outputs to the vertical and horizontal of an oscilloscope. *The resulting Lissajous pattern will give you a rough idea of the polarization (assuming the signal arrives from above). Pick a strong steady signal like WWV. *You'll probably see the polarization change erratically when the skip is in. *(Last time I did this was 20 years ago). *You'll also see that vertical and horizontal parts of the Lissajous display to wander around in amplitude fairly independently. *This is the main advantage of a polarization independent antenna. *The antenna will automagically select the strongest polarization to feed the receiver. There are circularly polarized HF antennas, but I'm too lazy to Google for them tonite. -- Jeff Liebermann * * 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558 Thank you for that! I have not seen the like printed any where soto me it is good stuff. When I model a polarization independent antenna the individual gains confuse me as each of the individual gains are some what 3 db down from the "total" gain. In other words "total" is not the addition of all the polarizations gains. I find it very difficult to get my mind wrapped around that fact. On the surface it would suggest that competition types would benefit from a polarization independent antenna. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lowe HF225 DC socket polarity? | Shortwave | |||
Polarity of 2SC1970 and 2SC1971 | Homebrew | |||
balun polarity? | Antenna | |||
BC-895 Reverse Polarity Mistake, Help! | Scanner |