Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 6:55*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
I was basing efficiency on all forces being accounted for with a higher gain resulting. Whether or not you account for all forces will not have any effect on gain. :/ This is another case of the hopeful free lunch.. But the cupboard was bare. ![]() The radiation from the vertical and horizontal polarizations added together will never end up being more than you started with. And an antenna that is a mix of both will be a compromise if the other antenna is purely one way or the other assuming no reflections, etc skewing the path. No free lunch.. ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lowe HF225 DC socket polarity? | Shortwave | |||
Polarity of 2SC1970 and 2SC1971 | Homebrew | |||
balun polarity? | Antenna | |||
BC-895 Reverse Polarity Mistake, Help! | Scanner |