Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote:
J. Mc Laughlin wrote: Let us not reject outright the interpretation of others just because their interpretation is different. Fine. My interpretation of Amateur is a person who cannot do things in a professional manner, a person who is interested in something, but for lack of intelligence, skill, persistence, or talent, will never become proficient in what they are interested in. Therefore, everyone has to accept my definition of Amateur radio operators as unskilled incompetents, eh? Especially since that very thing can be found in the dictionary, not an interpretation, but as synonymous with the word. Now that would be sad, wouldn't it? Names - Bah Humbug! - 73 de Mike N3LI - This is especially apropos during the winter Olympics, where amateur athletes are competing. They look proficient to me. But then, I'm just an amateur myself. A ham, even. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ham Radio Deluxe on Linux | Shortwave | |||
Packet Radio with Linux? | Digital | |||
Packet Radio with Linux? | Digital |