Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:43:05 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
wrote: Does the radiation pattern change much? Hi Joel, Depends on your meaning of "much." Given the ad-hoc nature of your goal (and the resolution of any S-Meter in those services): you wouldn't be able to tell any difference at all. Will it become so lossy (radiation resistance rapidly heading towards zero) that this isn't really a good idea in the first place? (I wouldn't be surprised if a patch antenna actually doesn't radiate much at all outside of the antenna's own resonances...) Or perhaps it's not possible to say, in general, what happens and one needs to perform simulations on a case-by-case basis? Loss will be largely dictated by match, and the matching components' and the radiator's Ohmic loss. I'm asking based on the thought that there are a lot of pretty nice, off-the-shelf antennas out there that were designed to be resonant (using, e.g., quarter-wave dimensions) at some pretty high frequency (2.4GHz being a common one, of course), and I'm interested in how viable it is to use these antenna for 2m/70cm amateur radio use. Because they look cool? That will change fast when you add in the matching accessories (and that doesn't mean fashion coordination). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Database of 72 Windom radiation patterns for different antenna heights | Antenna | |||
Database of 72 Windom radiation patterns for different antenna heights | Antenna | |||
Database of 72 Windom radiation patterns for different antenna heights | Antenna | |||
PIC operated FSK modem | General | |||
PIC operated FSK modem | Homebrew |