Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 24, 6:58*pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:06:44 -0700 (PDT), Keith Dysart wrote: I have often wondered if the manufacturer's tuning procedures had anything to do with maximizing output power transfer, or were they, in fact, optimizing some other aspect. This resolves quickly in measurement - no need to wonder unless it offers some secondary benefit of not measuring things. * An alternative is to simply examine conventional design considerations. *One can add to Plate current by throwing a lot of power into the grid. *More plate current yields more output power results, but grid lifetime plumments. One can do innumerable things to force an artificial outcome that strains to prove a distorted logic. *Examining a suite of sources, in initial conditions that are average for their application quickly reveals a common design paradigm. ****** The fundamental answer to your question is the manufacturer ultimately designs for market domination, or maximum investment return (the two don't necessarily converge). *Thus the marketplace gives us a spectrum of choice and the norm of the distribution reveals cautious design that has its eye on a value exchange expressed in money. *THAT is the only optimization you can expect = in an honest barter, you get what you pay for. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC You have gone to a bit higher level than I intended with my question and I agree with you conclusions at that level. But my question was more basic. When designing the filter for a PA, among other things, one uses the desired load to be applied to the tube and the disired load impedance to be supported and selects filter components to perform the desired transformation. When operating the radio, the operator has meters that measure some values, some knobs that control some component values and a procedure for adjusting these knobs. It is not at all obvious what exactly the result of performing the procedure is. Does it result in the same load being applied to the tube that was computed by the designer? There are some hints that the procedure will result in the load applied to the tube being real, but beyond that, what exactly are the circuit conditions that result? ....Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transmission Line Reflections | Antenna | |||
Reflections on rrap | Policy | |||
Reflections on rrap | Policy | |||
Reflections on rrap | Antenna | |||
Reflections on rrap | Policy |